Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia, Iran Warn U.S. They Will "Respond With Force" If Syria "Red Lines" Crossed Again
Zero Hedge ^ | 04/09/17 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 04/09/2017 8:16:19 AM PDT by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Yes, have you ever heard the term “mutual assured destruction”? Look it up. Putin does not want that any more than anyone else.


61 posted on 04/09/2017 12:34:16 PM PDT by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater

They may be proud, but they are not suicidal.


62 posted on 04/09/2017 12:36:52 PM PDT by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Seriously???

You don’t go nuke, unless you’re desperate or stupid or using it as your trump card.
(accept we have just as many trump cards)
Putin knows if he goes nuke, we’ll respond in kind.
Protecting Syria isn’t worth it for him.

Right now, Putin will send a ship or two into the area, to puff his chest and strut. He’ll warn our planes not to come in, lest they get “accidentally” shot down.
All posturing.
What planes is he going to shoot down?
Most of our strikes in Syria BEFORE Friday, were done by drones, not airplanes.
His announcement about a plane no fly zone is pointless, if planes aren’t being used. It’s bluster.
He sent a frigate into the area, “to stop” our destroyers from launching our cruise missiles. Accept his frigate doesn’t have the capability to stop our cruise missiles. It’s nothing but a chest puff.
Consider this.
The much vaunted s-400 defense system is in Syria.
And yet 59 cruise missiles were launched and NOT ONE cruise missile was shot down.

For Putin, it’s important to appear tough.
He knows that in a conventional war against the US, he loses.
If he goes nuclear, WE ALL lose...which means he loses


63 posted on 04/09/2017 12:39:43 PM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry

Nor are we. We spent 40 years in a MAD posture with the Soviet Union. There is a lot of theory on what steps require what reactions in the escalation of threat levels between them and us. Even some actual real-world experience. Do we nuke their homeland thereby ensuring our own destruction in response to their nuking one of our carrier battle groups? It’s not as simple as “they are not suicidal.” Not anywhere close.


64 posted on 04/09/2017 12:45:53 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater

They are not stupid enough to nuke us.


65 posted on 04/09/2017 12:54:12 PM PDT by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater
Russia turned back the joint US/European forces being assembled to throw them out of Crimea and reunite Ukraine by toggling a valve on and off a few times on their natural gas pipeline supplying Europe. No military force was needed. Wars are not only fought on conventional battlefields. While the US Navy is busy ruling the waves Russia is still in Crimea. And Syria.

Your view is correct...partially.

Military ISN'T the only way of doing things, which your point makes.

There are economical and
Political.

Crimea happened during the Lyin Kings reign.

Obama was Putins best weapon for 8 years.

Europe put themselves into their energy needs.
Their leadership flat out did stupid stuff.

As far as US/Euro forces being assembled, Obama had no intention of doing anything. Without US commitment, Europe isn't going to do anything.

It doesn't matter how big and bad your military is, if you have an idiot or traitor "leading".

Your analysis of the Russian/US military capabilities seems to have left out one other point. Russia is a nuclear armed power with MAD capability. They can not be militarily defeated unless they decide to be defeated. Escalation is always an option for them. They are a proud people - I would not want to bet the fate of life on this planet on the hope that they will back down when the future of their nation is at stake.

I didn't overlook anything. This article is about Russia warning the US...

First ask the question "why is Russia there?"

It's not national security.

Being that IT'S NOT national security, the LAST THING they want to do is anything that can escalate to nuke.

If they are in it strictly for creating a pipeline, nuclear annihilation is an awful high price for a single pipeline.

Russia had free reign to do what they wanted for 8 years, with no worry of retaliation. NOW they HAVE to resort to posturing.

66 posted on 04/09/2017 1:12:07 PM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry
They are not stupid enough to nuke us.

Are they smart enough to sink an oil tanker in the Straits of Hormuz thereby throwing the economies of the western nations into depression? Iran, a Russian client state has that capability and enough insanity to do that for sure. What would we do when a deadly strain of small pox kills half of Mexico City and sends 20 million terrified Mexicans straight at our border? Going to shoot them all to keep them from crossing the border? Think that might put a crimp in our economy and divide us ethnically like nothing we've ever experienced before? Biological weapons don't leave radiologic finger prints - who are you going to retaliate against when the wheat rust the Soviet Union developed in the '80s wipes out our entire wheat crop? I could go on for hours positing potential attacks Russia is capable of carrying out without even scratching the surface of what they are capable of. This is no where near as simple as our military will crush them in a heart beat. Wars are not only fought on conventional military battlefields.

Sun Tzu - The Art of War
67 posted on 04/09/2017 1:15:45 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Barry’s red Lines? And crossed by whom?


68 posted on 04/09/2017 1:27:20 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

No more uranium shipments to Russians!


69 posted on 04/09/2017 1:28:07 PM PDT by orinoco (Orinoco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountn man
If they are in it strictly for creating a pipeline, nuclear annihilation is an awful high price for a single pipeline.

Actually, they are in it to prevent the creation of the pipeline that would remove their strangehold on Europe. And it will never come to nuclear annihilation. One side will blink first. The Russians don't have a backstabbing political party ensuring turmoil at home like we do. It's a lot easier to face down an opponent that you know has traitors among his people.
70 posted on 04/09/2017 1:39:13 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater
Do we nuke their homeland thereby ensuring our own destruction in response to their nuking one of our carrier battle groups?

We'd never have to resort to a nuke on their homeland for retaliation, if they nuked a carrier battle group.

The Russians have 168 projection capable ships.

The Russians have 13 Boomers.
3 built post USSR, in '13-'14. These are the boats that get the majority of their tour exercises.

The Russian Boomers do 5-6 tours a year.

That means 3-4 Boomers out of 13 are battle ready. With 2 maybe 3 at sea at any time.

We know where they're at.

Russia built 13 Oscars (cruise missile subs)
4 have been scrapped. 1 lost.
Leaving 8
3 are being modernized. Leaving 5. 3 are nearly ready for retirement. Seldom seeing significant exercise time. Leaving 2 really battle ready. That means no more than 2 are out at any given time.

They have 17 nuclear attack subs.
7 of these are post USSR, with only 2 being from 2000 and 2014.
These 7 are the ones kept in battle ready condition.

Usually 3 maybe 4, out at any given time.

They have 24 conventional powered attack subs.
8 are post USSR, 2 being built in '16, 2 in '15, 2 in '14 and 1 in '10.

These 8 are their battle ready.
4-5 of these are out at any particular time.

At most, 12 subs total, at sea at any time.

Once all are accounted for a timed response takes them all out.

Simultaneously, a timed cruise missile strike hits every battle ready projection surface ship, about 60.
With about half of those actually being out of port, on station.
Followed by the remaining being taken out later.

TWO lowly destroyers launched 59 cruise missiles in a matter of minutes.

If Putin decides to nuke a carrier battle group,
He might as well keep lobbing nukes everywhere.

71 posted on 04/09/2017 2:17:46 PM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater

Our actions in Syria are more likely to deter any of those things than to cause them.


72 posted on 04/09/2017 2:37:04 PM PDT by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: mountn man
We'd never have to resort to a nuke on their homeland for retaliation, if they nuked a carrier battle group.

A nuclear attack on our fleet is just one of innumerable options they have and not one I would expect to see as an opening move. If Russia decides to engage it will happen on a field of their choosing - and would likely involve an element of plausible deniability.

Biological WMDs handed off to islamic lunatics might fit that bill... Shutting down oil shipments through the Straits of Hormuz... An EMP attack pointing back to North Korea somehow... I'm sure glad we have a 3D chess master in the White House because things have the possibility of getting very, very complicated very quickly.
73 posted on 04/09/2017 3:12:32 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry
Our actions in Syria are more likely to deter any of those things than to cause them.

You really don't know what the battles in Syria are about, do you? Why do you think we are arming, training, providing intelligence to and FIGHTING ALONGSIDE AL-QUEDA TERRORISTS? They are our avowed enemies. We are fighting WITH them against Assad. Can you explain that?
74 posted on 04/09/2017 3:20:26 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Garth Tater

Apparently you don’t. We are not fighting Assad with the terrorists. We are not fighting Assad at all. We destroyed some property as a warning, a deterrent, so that he would not break the terms of the treaty again. We are not engaged in war, and now that Trump has done this, we most likely won’t have to in the future.


75 posted on 04/09/2017 4:08:34 PM PDT by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry
This is a picture of John McCain with the "vetted" and "moderate" islamic jihadists we are arming, training and FIGHTING alongside. The guy in the back is ISIS Chief Al-Baghdadi. Three others in that photo are also high ranking ISIS leaders. link



Are you saying we are not arming and fighting WITH these terrorists or are you saying they are not who they appear to be? Not that it would really matter because either way you would be wrong.

U.S. Is Sending 400 More Troops to Syria

Note: Sending 400 MORE troops to Syria. We already have boots on the ground fighting with the islamics that are fighting against Assad. In your convoluted mind that might mean we're not fighting against Assad - but not in his.
76 posted on 04/09/2017 4:39:49 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
So in effect, all this is because of Europe. That is, all this energy needs a market, and Europe is the market they are fighting over.

Yes, that is correct.

Some of the important details:

European North Sea oil reserves are winding down, this was the main petro supply to Western Europe and they will lose almost all of it within the next decade.

Saudi and ME suppliers (except Iran) to this point have agreed to use only Western Banking and price their petro products in US Dollars, as is currently practiced.

Russia and Iran will work with any stable payment system which could cut out Western Banking and the US Dollar.

New European oil and gas reserves found and exploited, are all on Norwegian and Russian territory and the Russian Arctic.

Tanker ship transport of petro products to Western Europe is much more expensive than pipeline transport, so Western European Globalists and Bankers are in a world of hurt unless they can get the Qatari pipelines through Syria and Turkey.

As an aside, this is why Libyan and Syrian oil can be stolen, transported and sold to Europe by ISIS through Turkey.

77 posted on 04/10/2017 8:50:55 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America returns to the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Saveourcountry

Thanks.

Interesting about their planes...hope the Russians ask for money upfront and take their sweet time making them. ;)


78 posted on 04/10/2017 7:34:15 PM PDT by proud American in Canada (May God Bless the U.S.A. (Trump: I will bear the slings and arrows for you, the American people))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

I don’t think he is looking at himself smiling because of vanity. I think he is practicing. He knows that his smile is the cover for all the evil he has gotten away with. For him it is studied and valuable.


79 posted on 04/11/2017 7:47:25 AM PDT by Bellflower (Who dares believe Jesus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson