Posted on 04/08/2017 5:41:18 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
YouTube is addressing a corporate boycott: Advertising sponsors are withdrawing ads, but the solution involves disproportionately censoring channels that are not politically correct, specifically anything remotely conservative.
Google AdSense, a program enabling YouTube publishers to receive ad revenue from corporate sponsors, caused titan corporations like AT&T, Verizon, Starbucks, Wal-Mart, Pepsi, and several others to pull their advertising from YouTube because their ads reportedly are premiering on channels with terroristic and hateful content.
In an effort to comply with corporate demands, YouTube has secretly enforced their restricted mode to hide age-inappropriate content, shield comments from all videos, and allow third-party media firms to evaluate which channels and videos should receive ad revenue. But it appears much of the content caught in this censorship sweep are conservative channels.
{..snip..}
(Excerpt) Read more at redalertpolitics.com ...
Solution: Start an alternative to Youtube.
It’s hitting gun channels too. Many or most will die on the vine.
One thing you can be assured of is that the Nazis at Google will always aid dictators. Google proved that when they gave the ChiComms the addresses of the Falun Gong resistance.
Google’s motto: “Do no evil” is complete bullsh*t.
The Nazi pigs at Google will betray every American at every opportunity.
Lock ‘n load.
Google is shameful.
“Solution: Start an alternative to Youtube.”
Temporary solution. Google, YT, Twitter didn’t start out that way. They, like the rest, get swallowed up by the PC machine or forced to conform. Creators cash in, mainstream media types take control.
What happened:
WSJ reporters went to major online advertisers, Pepsi, etc., presenting screen-captures of some videos, telling the companies concerned, “Did you know your products were advertised on YouTube videos containing the N WORD..?”
Rightfully the companies were shocked and admonished YouTube to do something about it.
Here’s the important part:
The different screen captures of the supposedly offending videos ALL featured exactly the same view count/thumbs up/thumbs down:
—> AN IMPOSSIBILITY < —
This whole hush campaign basically represents an attempt by Old Media to stifle the New Media they can’t compete with.
WSJ didn’t even
what can people with YouTube accounts do..?
1. For video-makers you really like, note there is a little BELL icon. Push it one time for that maker; that tells Google you want to be informed EVERY TIME that maker comes out with a new video. Picture this action as being like “subscribing two times”.
2. Sign the petition to boycott companies currently boycotting YouTube. I checked yesterday and the petition still had only something like 800 signatures.
Do you consider Pew Die-Pie a right-wing extremist..?
How about Phillip DeFranco..?
It’s like saying Lindsay Graham is in the Waffen SS —RIDICULOUS.
Yet that is exactly where this is going.
Legacy Media sees the onslaught of consumer choice and they have decided to DESTROY IT:
You WILL enjoy ABC news. You WILL enjoy Matlock re-runs. ALL DAY, every day.
Vid.me, huh. Ok I’ll give it a look see.
This is definitely going on. I encounter it daily.
it’s not going to stop until enough conservatives make a stink about it like they did over the censorship going on at facebook
They [the mega social media moguls] ought to have their IP ... entire IP dealing with social media. Let
there be competition.
Do Newspapers and Magazines have IP?
YouTube, a Public Accommodation company and a Public utility is actively Discriminating against people for their Personal Lifestyle Choices.
Where is the EEOC,Attorney general, Civil Rights lawsuits, shouldn’t AG Sessions shut them down TODAY for tis Blatant Discrimination based on HATE??
This will hurt Trump.
Bfl
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.