Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

NON print version:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/04/07/the-clean-water-rule-is-about-federal-authority-not-water/


2 posted on 04/08/2017 8:20:09 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rktman

“Six categories include traditional navigable waters, interstate waters, territorial seas (these three are called “jurisdictional waters”), impoundments of jurisdictional waters, “tributaries,” and “adjacent” waters. These are jurisdictional by rule in all cases, requiring no additional analysis in order to be regulated. To be adjacent, the rule uses the rubric of “neighboring,” which can be met by waters in the 100-year floodplain—meaning land which might be wet one out of every 100 days is a water of the U.S. and can be federally controlled. Texas coastal prairie wetlands are another type of water automatically considered adjacent, and therefore subject to regulation.

The final two categories can, upon “case-specific analysis,” be determined to have a “significant nexus” either alone or in combination with “similarly situated waters in the region.” The concept of a significant nexus was created by Supreme Court JUSTICE ANTHONY KENNEDY in 2006 and is not a scientific term, “but rather a determination made by the agencies.”

Yet another reason why getting Kennedy to retire would be a very good thing, provided Trump can come up with a true Constitutionalist for his replacement. I guess Kennedy bull$hitted Reagan to get the appointment, because he certainly is no “strict constructionist!”


5 posted on 04/08/2017 8:38:55 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson