Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

Syria didn’t have the weapons to do this atrocity? Or what?

Doesn’t make sense that Assad would have done this thing? Where’s the careful analysis?


4 posted on 04/06/2017 1:03:49 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

He’s been using chemical weapons for quite some time, mostly chlorine gas. If you are getting away with it, why not use it? It’s very effective and doesn’t damage the infrastructure.
And Syria never joined the Chemical Weapon Convention.


8 posted on 04/06/2017 1:06:19 PM PDT by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson