To: RummyChick
Syria didn’t have the weapons to do this atrocity? Or what?
Doesn’t make sense that Assad would have done this thing? Where’s the careful analysis?
4 posted on
04/06/2017 1:03:49 PM PDT by
reasonisfaith
("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
To: reasonisfaith
He’s been using chemical weapons for quite some time, mostly chlorine gas. If you are getting away with it, why not use it? It’s very effective and doesn’t damage the infrastructure.
And Syria never joined the Chemical Weapon Convention.
8 posted on
04/06/2017 1:06:19 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson