Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: Brad from Tennessee
Well, this is interesting.
2 posted on
04/03/2017 8:40:24 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Brad from Tennessee
She’s going to claim she had to because Russians.
We will laugh at it, she will walk.
3 posted on
04/03/2017 8:42:25 PM PDT by
IncPen
(Progressivism is in perpetual need of an enemy against which to refresh its outrage.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
The shadowy cartel that snuck Obama into office used the IRS to harass patriotic non-profits.
Just makes sense that they would use intelligence agencies to harass patriotic candidates.
4 posted on
04/03/2017 8:43:11 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
She ordered detailed spreadsheets to record "incidental," accidentally collected information. Riight.
Don't forget, nothing in Government gets done with out a project number, time codes, weekly time sheets made out and filed electronically, progress reports (weekly, monthly, and quarterly), meetings to coordinate efforts and assign sub-tasks, "lessons learned" meetings, "brainstorming" meetings, etc., etc., etc.
All of which produce records, reports, manloading charts, etc., etc., ad infinitum..
All within the executive branch, which DJT now runs.
6 posted on
04/03/2017 8:45:14 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Liberals think in propaganda)
To: Brad from Tennessee
This was what I was thinking. Incidental intercepts with “Russians” was happening infrequently or not at all for some staff. I always thought 0bama went after them with intercepts of their calls, not the “Russians”.
7 posted on
04/03/2017 8:45:22 PM PDT by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Obama, true to form, is never near when these things happen. At some point, some one must turn on him, tired of taking the arrows.
9 posted on
04/03/2017 8:45:29 PM PDT by
llevrok
(A group of baboons is called a "congress." Just sayin' .....)
To: Brad from Tennessee
“detailed spreadsheets”
What did this lying liar mean by that?
To: Brad from Tennessee
Well, at least we know why they were so confident about winning. They were cheating every which way.
11 posted on
04/03/2017 8:47:54 PM PDT by
Nipfan
(The desire to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it - H L Mencken)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Spreadsheets? Was she taking bets as well?
12 posted on
04/03/2017 8:49:09 PM PDT by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
To: Brad from Tennessee
What was produced by the intelligence community at the request of Ms. Rice were detailed spreadsheets of intercepted phone calls with unmasked Trump associates in perfectly legal conversations with individuals,...but of course, she's on video saying she was doing this so she could turn the sheets over to the incoming administration and they would have the information available to them - but on the other hand, Farkas is on video saying she was urging more collection because she was afraid the incoming administration would destroy it after they gained power - these two should have at least gotten their stories straight before going rogue.....
To: Brad from Tennessee
"There's a show on Netflix called 'Orange is the New Black' about a women's federal lockup. I'd advise you to watch and take notes."
To: Brad from Tennessee
In other fake news, Susan Rice, in an exclusive interview on CNN, admitted that she unmasked various Trump campaign members as part of a spontaneous demonstration in response to a YouTube video.
16 posted on
04/03/2017 8:50:06 PM PDT by
bigbob
To: Brad from Tennessee
But she doesn’t remember a single thing about that.
Professional Democrat all the way!
17 posted on
04/03/2017 8:50:07 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(President Trump is not a politician.)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Wow! Seems like the faucet had been turned on.
18 posted on
04/03/2017 8:50:12 PM PDT by
nhwingut
(Trump Pence 16 - Blow Up DC)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Here we go again ...a cat and mouse game...she’ll sit in front of the special investigation Consul and spews the fifth and walks away pure as the driven snow!!! Sorry but we’ve seen this song and dance before!! She’ll skate! The swamp and the mediapukes will see to it..while the eunuch pubs crawl back to their holes!
To: Brad from Tennessee
20 posted on
04/03/2017 8:51:00 PM PDT by
Bryan24
(When in doubt, move to the right..........)
To: Brad from Tennessee
At any other time in our history, this would cause a Constitutional crisis. This is exponentially worse than Watergate. Where is the f’ing outrage from the Reps?
22 posted on
04/03/2017 8:51:36 PM PDT by
kabar
To: Brad from Tennessee
Demos love to exaggerate. We need to quantify the cost of this extensive spying episode. So, 17 intelligence agencies for over 14 months, surveillance of some 30 or so separate people. Including agency resources and salaries, it has to be $1 million per month per agency per target. That’s got to work out to over 5 - 6 billion dollars.
23 posted on
04/03/2017 8:51:42 PM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
To: Brad from Tennessee
Doran charged that potential serious crimes were undertaken because this is a leaking of signal intelligence. Thats a felony, he told The DCNF. And you can get 10 years for that. It is a tremendous abuse of the system. Were not supposed to be monitoring American citizens. Bigger than the crime, is the breach of public trust.
Are we not talking about multiple counts here? 10 yrs x (n).
And then, isn't there a conspiracy angle here? Let's consider the ringleaders, could they be Obama and Clinton?
Biggest worry for Rice? What if a dozen or so government employees flip for immunity? That could lead to a stampede!
24 posted on
04/03/2017 8:52:21 PM PDT by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Brad from Tennessee
They should check back to 2011 and 2012 before Obama’s reelection. They could have been doing the same thing to Romney.
25 posted on
04/03/2017 8:53:32 PM PDT by
kabar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson