Posted on 04/02/2017 6:37:48 PM PDT by davikkm
Senior Fox News Correspondent, Adam Housley revealed on Friday that Intel Chair Devin Nunes (R-CA) knows who unmasked the identities of Trump and his close associates.
Sources also told him that the unmasking was purely for political purposes to embarrass Trump and had NOTHING to do with national security.
Now this.. According to activist and author Mike Cernovich the leaker and unmasker is Susan Rice.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
isnt that the truth...I suppose he’s been lounging around the house eating egg rolls and waving his finger in the air.
Susan Rice and Evelyn Farkas, While I don’t mean to be too preachy, this is what happens when you give power to people who don’t deserve it, and security clearances to people who haven’t earned them.
When is Barry Soetoro due back from the Elba, errr Tahiti
From your lips to Pres. Trump’s ear.
Amateurs faking professionalism don’t make them professionals
“She has a black woman, she will never be punished.”
I wonder if she can be sued under civil law?
He should remain in exile...
It appears that H and six of her aids kept their clearance after she left office. Supposidly to help write a book or something. No one seems to know when and If that clearance ended.
Remember Farkle was working for H in 2015 after she left her high clearance job (did she keep her clearance too)
Married to a white man.
I simply asked what evidence? Of course the Russian thing would likely be the go-to answer. And the first question to that allegation would likely be, "Based on what evidence"?
By the way, this isn't your private chat room, anyone can comment here without your approval. That's the way it works.
Re: Secure donations explained...
Thank you
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3531403/posts?page=163#163
Wouldn’t the DOJ be the ones to do legal action for these criminals? In which case, what would the Senate have to do with it?
A large number of extremely serious crimes have been committed by who knows how many people. If there is not heavy legal action, then there is no rule of law any more.
She carries water for Obama...
“Evidently the NYT had the story for the last couple of days and refused to run with it...”
The person that had the story at the NYT is Maggie Haberman.
Maggie Haberman at the NYT is good friends with Katie Walsh. Deputy White House chief of staff Katie Walsh was recently fired by Reince Priebus for leaking information to the NYT.
“The transparent sequence of events reveals that Walsh was the source of NYT reporter Maggie Haberman’s article; (Walsh and Haberman are “friends”).”
None of the above Liars.
The person that had the story at the NYT is Maggie Haberman.
Maggie Haberman at the NYT is good friends with Katie Walsh. Deputy White House chief of staff Katie Walsh was recently fired by Reince Priebus for leaking information to the NYT.
“The transparent sequence of events reveals that Walsh was the source of NYT reporter Maggie Haberman’s article; (Walsh and Haberman are “friends”).”
I went back and re-read the title.
Need to reverse my answer.
All of the Above! are guilty of doing that.
In my opinion the most likely is Brennan.
Where did you see this? I missed it.
All GUILTY
And for a variety of reasons
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.