Posted on 03/31/2017 5:25:58 PM PDT by Whenifhow
SIP SLOWLY – We’ve been waiting patiently to see how the media would obfuscate the Evelyn Farkas accidental revelations about Obama administration current and former officials trying to leak intelligence information. An NBC report provides the answer:
(Via NBC) Obama administration officials were so concerned about what would happen to key classified documents related to the Russia probe once President Trump took office that they created a list of document serial numbers to give to senior members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, a former Obama official told NBC News. The official said that after the list of documents related to the probe into Russian interference in the U.S. election was created in early January, he hand-carried it to the committee members. The numbers themselves were not classified, said the official.
The purpose, said the official, was to make it “harder to bury” the information, “to share it with those on the Hill who could lawfully see the documents,” and to make sure it could reside in an Intelligence committee safe, “not just at Langley [CIA hq].” (link) There you see the deflection and cover story angle for the media. The reports themselves were classified intelligence; however, the numbers identifying the classified documents themselves were “not classified”. This provides the cover for all the Farkas-minded parties involved to say they were not actually spreading classified intelligence, they were just spreading the numerical identity of classified intelligence documents.
See how that works?
Will the public accept that excuse and explanation? We’ll have to wait and see; but that’s the angle the left-wing ideologues in the media are using.
However, that said, Fox News is now reporting a rather startling set of facts surrounding Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes information regarding the Obama administration.
https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/intel-chairs.jpg
In a Fox News report from Adam Housley –Video HERE– people within the intelligence community are providing more details on the political weaponization of the intelligence community and their efforts of surveillance on President-Elect Trump’s transition team. Key Highlights to the information given to Chairman Devin Nunes (per Fox):
♦ 1. The intelligence surveillance, that led to the unmasking reports now being reviewed by ranking member Adam Schiff, started well before Donald Trump was the Republican presidential nominee.
♦ 2. The Black Hat who did the unmasking is very high up in the intelligence world and is not in the FBI. Putting that aspect into prior information leads to a higher probability the individual was Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.
♦ 3. The two people reported yesterday in the New York Times report, by reporter Maggie Haberman, were not Nunes sources. Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence at the National Security Council, and Michael Ellis, a lawyer who works on national security issues at the White House Counsel’s Office, only helped Nunes navigate the intelligence. They were not the source.
That Cohen-Watnick and Michael Ellis were not the sources, leads further credence to the belief that their names were seeded to Katie Walsh as a canary operation to identify the White House leaker.
♦ 4. Chairman Nunes was told about the unmasking of President-elect Trump’s team back in January BEFORE Trump’s tweet about Obama’s spying operation.
♦ 5. In order for Nunes to see the intelligence reports and not compromise his source it took Nunes time to coordinate how to review the intelligence reports. He could not go to the source intel SCIF without compromising his source. Nunes chose the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) SCIF on the White House grounds in order to protect his source. Nunes chose the White House because it was the only other location he and the facilitators could use for viewing without outing the source.
If you’ve been following along, and you add in this significant pixel to the picture, you can clearly see who becomes the most likely source. [*Hint* rhymes with “Dodgers“] A frustrated White Hat; a person who just doesn’t like politicians, that doesn’t surprise CTH readers.
https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/clapper-comey-rogers-brennan-1.jpg
♦ 6. Nothing Chairman Nunes has highlighted, and nothing the White House is challenging ranking member Adam Schiff and Senator Mark Warner to review, has anything to do with Russia.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5380606763001/?#sp=show-clips
Former intel officer: Nunes WH meeting was done right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vlg6Tu69LpI
Notice that NONE of this has made the msm!
msm #FAKENEWS
CNN #FAKENEWS
NBC #FAKENEWS
I was watching Spicer press briefing today, most of the #FAKENEWS reporters that were there were really interested in what door Nunes went through last week. Over and over was the question. What door, what door. Spicer laid into them. No questions about Farkas!! Unreal!
Things have not been going the dimoKKKRATS way on this. Like said they will not say much on the substance of the evidence but try and taint how is was done. That is the complete opposite track they took with Flynn.
The Farkas Fracas would have been a catchier title.
“you can clearly see who becomes the most likely source. [*Hint* rhymes with “Dodgers“]”
Mulva?
Wait...
I give up.
watching cnn right now about this.....Cooper is stumbling and stuttering so bad...they are scared stiff.
Which is why Comey was very precise in his wording of his denial of knowledge of surveillance and having searched the FBI, when speaking on Trump's tweet .
That does not mean he did not know of Trump being spied on and that info being passed around, it just was not the FBI or him doing it. Now, he had no problem using shady democrat IT intelligence source, with and ax to grind against Russia, as a way to put an investigation into place on Trump. He is as dirty as the rest in his own way.
Dolores !
The first video is Adam Housley reporting that the NYT article the the 2 names was not correct. In the article by Sundance, note this quote:
Quote
That Cohen-Watnick and Michael Ellis were not the sources, leads further credence to the belief that their names were seeded to Katie Walsh as a canary operation to identify the White House leaker.
Unquote
High-Ranking Obama Officials Unmasked Private Citizens for Political Gain
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5380606763001/?#sp=show-clips
Interview with Mike Pregent, Hudson Institute Fellow alaysis of the intelligence info so far and explains “reverse targeting” and unmasking.
And he says Farkas explains that she revealed more than suggested earlier and needs to be questioned.
Former intel officer: Nunes WH meeting was done right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vlg6Tu69LpI
What a rotten name!
Michael Rogers, NSA.
mike rogers 3rd anniversary as nsa director arrives April 3. Will he see his 4th?
“you can clearly see who becomes the most likely source. [*Hint* rhymes with “Dodgers“]”
See here - outlined in yellow - he’s the tipster
https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/clapper-comey-rogers-brennan-1.jpg
Not for the baddest nut in the Boiled Peanuts.
FarkAs$
The Farkas Fracas would have been a catchier title.
***
that’s a good one! Be sure to watch the videos.
LOLOL! :D <3
Thank you kindly, fellas, I was somehow not aware of this person.
I’m hoping we know all about him soon when he’s thrown into Gitmo (assuming he’s guilty, of course).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
