I do not respond to those who have neither legal knowledge, nor the ability to realize they do not have it, or enough education to respond politely.
We will simply let the jury decide, which of course, all the attackers here and elsewhere are trying to prevent.
But I responded to you, even though you are lacking recognition of a crucial element. I pointed right at it. (a) Read line (a). It all starts there. Miss that gate -- nothing else following can or need apply.
There you go again, attributing motive (as a cheap excuse for your own blindness). What's that you say? It is impolite for me to say that to you? You started in with the accusations. Don't now try to have things both ways. It's hypocrisy when you do (and you have).
Paul Looney, and Broden also filed very early (even prior to indictments) formal request for speedy trial. Looney followed that up later, too. It was Renya who filed indictments -- then said he wasn't prepared to proceed. Curious that. Now you try to blame that on freepers here? sheesh!
Most of the time, when prosecutors file charges, they include a filing stating that they are ready. It's almost a prerequisite, although one usually filed concurrently with indictment. What was Renya's excuse? That it was a complex case. So far, in only one case have any delay been attributable to defendants -- and that, only recently, and in instance of only one defendant.
When a prosecutor files charges -- then requests delays in taking those charges to trial, what is that other than denying defendants constitutional right to speedy trail? That Renya has so far gotten away with it (through cynical manipulation of judicial processes) in no wise makes him having done so ~constitutional~ simply for that reason.
Actually, you and the corrupt DA Reyna are the ones doing that. Posters here are decrying his efforts to drag all this out and deny the defendants their day in court.