The "hearsay" you're whining about comes from two different reliable sources, one of which was a member of the Freedom Caucus himself, and another of which is more well connected to the administration than you'll ever be.
Actually, three sources, because one of the sources is the President himself. He clearly thinks that there was a lack of good faith. Hence his comments about "loyalty".
So keep on throwing your stones, Tokyo Rose, and know that you're delighting the enemy with your conscious effort to undermine morale.
The "truth"—which you seem to think you have a monopoly on—can be presented in very disingenuous wrappings.
Someone like Jim Robinson knows how to offer constructive criticism.
You, on the other hand, are doing nothing but being destructive. You're simply too wrapped up in your own self-righteousness to realize it.
When you—for acting like a petulant child—got put on timeout by JimRob, it was for a perfectly legitimate reason.
I've stated before that I believe that Freepers can legitimately disagree as to whether this healthcare bill should have been passed or not.
What I categorically reject is the idea that anyone's patriotism should be called into question based upon which stance they took.
That is to be distinguished from someone who believes the President is a "con man", and allows that belief to slant everything they say about him...
Jarhead 9297 said it this time in reply #100 so I do not have to:
Find it odd the overwhelming majority aren’t taking exception or raising points with the content of what you’ve posted vs. either directly attacking the messenger or diverting the conversation?
That tells me you’ve raised interesting points that make many are uncomfortable to face. I always put members of this site above all others because of their critical thought processes. When did we lose that?
