Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford

You purposely dissemble as oft before. Trump’s words are not innapropriate now or then as a statement of resolve or intent. What is inappropriate is the suggestion that if a promise is not fullfilled in its entirety in 60 days or less than its sell date is passed.

Is that the standard you hold yourself to or that any other president has been held to? Americans understand that there are 3 branches of government and Trump is one of those. He can promise to do his utmost and to see it through but it is ridiculous not to factor in the situation as a whole and the things he can accomplish himself vs the things he needs to work towards accomplishing with the other branches.

“Haters going to hate” while the rest of us can focus on getting things done with the tools we have.


192 posted on 03/30/2017 10:01:08 AM PDT by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: JayGalt
You accuse me of dissembling when quoting Donald Trump's own words, arguing I do not give him time enough to fulfill his promises because I hold him to a false standard:

Americans understand that there are 3 branches of government and Trump is one of those. He can promise to do his utmost and to see it through but it is ridiculous not to factor in the situation as a whole and the things he can accomplish himself vs the things he needs to work towards accomplishing with the other branches.

Well, Americans also understand that criminal prosecution is entirely in the hands of one branch of government, Donald Trump's branch of government, the executive. No branch can stop him nor has any branch attempted to stop him from empanelling a grand jury, rendering up an indictment and bringing her to trial. He has not done so in 69 days and, quite to the contrary, has in his unfettered state expressed an intention not to do so.

I think most Americans understand who is dissembling about his executive powers to bring on an indictment!

Considering the question of Rino Care, it is not I but Donald Trump himself who today has attacked the most conservative elements of an another branch of government, the Freedom Caucus, and threatened not only to abandon them but to campaign against them while he makes common cause with Democrats!

You say it is too soon to criticize the president under these circumstances. I think we are entitled to ask, how many betrayals must we suffer in silence before we are permitted to speak out? Are we to find the whole of the conservative agenda betrayed before we speak? Are we not entitled to speak out now try to save what is salvageable? Can we not speak out to prevent the executive branch selling out to the Democrats in the legislative branch? If not now, when?

As to DACA, the president has made his intentions plain enough. The time has past when we should be silenced in the face of a flat reversal of his campaign posture. Words have meaning, even if uttered by Donald Trump. I do not criticize Trump for his reversals on travel ban caused by a third branch of government, the judiciary, I do criticize Trump for a reversal of DACA caused not by a co-equal branch of government but by Trump's own betrayal.

The conservative cause is far more important than Donald Trump. He has no right to gag us from observing the obvious, especially when the obvious has been expressed by Trump himself.

… focus on getting things done with the tools we have.

On Free Republic we have but one tool, the tool of speech. That includes Donald Trump's speech.


194 posted on 03/30/2017 11:21:38 AM PDT by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson