Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/29/2017 5:39:53 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: maggief

Deep State is concerned that another, more accurate, truth is going to come out...


2 posted on 03/29/2017 5:41:25 AM PDT by IncPen (Progressivism is in perpetual need of an enemy against which to refresh its outrage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Thanks for posting this.

Alperovtich still refers to APT 28 and APT 29 as “Fancy Bear” and “Cozy Bear”? Why use these colorful names rather than the accepted technical names?

He wouldn’t be supporting an agenda, would he? /s


4 posted on 03/29/2017 5:59:59 AM PDT by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

what, you mean they could be wrong?


5 posted on 03/29/2017 6:00:18 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Hillary Clinton’s policy of anti-Russian regime change in Ukraine is at the root of all this Russian hacking narrative. The “crimes” of Trump associates that Dems are so worked up about seem to involve working for or associating with any company or interest that is not on Hillary’s side of the Ukrainian coup d’état and its disastrous aftermath.

I would certainly like to see Ukraine free of Russian interference and domination. Unfortunately, what might be extremely good is not always within our power to effect, at least without extremely negative consequences. Ukraine has suffered thousands of dead and wounded, vast territorial loss, massive economic dislocations, etc. Russia has major credibility is the Middle East now because Putin intervened in Syria o create a bargaining chip and as payback for US interference in Ukraine.

Big Questions:
1) Why have the Democrats subordinated the US to Ukrainian nationalist politics? Ukrainians have an understandable motive to seek freedom from Russia. What was in it for the Democrats?
2) Who could possibly be so naive as to think the Russians would accept US meddling in their back yard without response? Ukrainian nationalists of course benefit from any anti-US reaction from Russia, by locking us into a cycle of conflict. Why would any US “statesman” fail to understand this?
3) Why has the US news media omitted to explore Clinton’s role in Ukraine, or looked into how and why the Democrats hitched their wagon to a Cold War policy of squeezing Russia? It explains exactly why the Russians “hate” her. It wasn’t just the pantsuits.
4) Is our entire intel community committed to this policy, or just the Democrats, following party orders? What are their real reasons to think this is a practical course, with benefits to the US outweighing the costs?

The American public deserves an airing of what s driving so much of our current political angst.


6 posted on 03/29/2017 6:30:08 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: maggief

Similar thread

“Something Stinks Here” - CrowdStrike Revises, Retracts Parts Of Explosive Russian Hacking Report
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3539112/posts


7 posted on 03/29/2017 11:29:52 AM PDT by Whenifhow (when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson