Posted on 03/28/2017 11:41:09 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
Critics now claim Chairman Nunes is too compromised by association with Mr. Trump to oversee an honest inquiry. But what of Mr. Comey? Many Democrats believe he cost Mrs. Clinton the election. Is it not at least possible he might see taking on Mr. Trump as an opportunity to redeem himself? It augurs ill when we forget political legitimacy is ultimately decided at the ballot box and look to the unelected for a political shortcut—whether this be a special prosecutor, an independent commission or an FBI director.
So let Mr. Comey investigate. But it should not stop the intelligence committees from doing whatever they need to do to get to bottom of what really happened with Russia. Because in our system it’s the elected people we send to Washington who are meant to keep an eye on the permanent government—not the other way ’round.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
Because in our system it’s the elected people we send to Washington who are meant to keep an eye on the permanent government—not the other way ’round.
Comey has been covering up Clinton detritus for decades now. He is wholly bought and wholly owned.
Where’s Gordon Freeman when you need him.....
And, why are we only focusing on Russia? And why only on Trump? Lets look at China, and Saudi Arabia, and Ukraine, and Iran. Lets look at political leaders current and recent. Lets look at who actually delivers favors, and lets look at who is actually owned by who.
I think Trump happens to be our PRESIDENT and association with him has not yet been declared a crime.
Looks like McCain is desperately trying to conceal his own dirty diapers on this.
Too cute by half. Every one of the SOBs doing this who didn't also use "Mr. Obama" after January 2009 is a butt-swab.
Mr. (not President) niteowl77
“G man”?? My azz. It’s his first law enforcement job. He’s never made an arrest in his life. It’s the first job where he could carry a gun and use deadly force. I doubt he even got qualified and carries one.
EVERYONE was shocked when Comey spent 15 minutes laying out a case for indicting hilLIARy, and then announced “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case”...
Some libtards on TV were even saying to themselves “OMG he’s going to indict her”
So he has NO CREDIBILITY
>
EVERYONE was shocked when Comey spent 15 minutes laying out a case for indicting hilLIARy, and then announced “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case”...
Some libtards on TV were even saying to themselves “OMG he’s going to indict her”
So he has NO CREDIBILITY
>
No credibility? He re-wrote the law on the spot...and not a (R) stood-up or did a DAMN thing about it.
Even more egregious, IMO, is keeping him on-board since 1/20. That does *not* smack of smarts, but of whispering political winds; a 2x-shot of stupid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.