[Fhios]

If this were all true, they should be behind Trump 100% and been deeply involved in the dismantling and replacement of Obamacare.

Repeal and replace does not mean repeal then replace. We know what happens if we do that.

Now Trump is going to try and make up the difference with the Democrats in the House and leave the GOP Senate all hung up by Schumer.

Why not just pass a replacement that effectively kills Obamacare?

[z3n]

"Repeal and replace does not mean repeal then replace. We know what happens if we do that."

Should we really expect a replace then repeal to ever happen? I don't think anyone would because it seems in this case that to replace first really means to add and amend. When exactly does the behemoth legislation ever get replaced if it is just growing in size and complexity?

[Conservative_caterer]

If they leave Obamacare on the books and just modify it (that’s what the AHCA was), then it can simply be put back in place by the next simple dem majority. It needs to come off the books.

[taxcontrol]

Because the HFC and conservative in general DO NOT WANT TO REPLACE Obamacare. Not with Hillarycare, or Romneycar, or with Ryancare or with Trumpcare or with any other type of “government care”.

REPEAL, period, full stop

[hollyweed]

Why can’t you except the fact that Trump will be no more successful running healthcare than Obama? Repeal means repeal. The same as the over 50 times they voted for it. It’s not ideological, it’s simply a matter of doing what they said they would do.