Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reverend Wright
By placing them on Medicaid you are also in favor of them losing their home, because you lose your home or any other assets to the government. Is that okay with you? So - sick people get to lose everything - Pareto's Law does not apply because you are suggesting that 100% of sick people with pre existing conditions should lose everything.
Guess your planning on never getting sick, losing your insurance then going on Medicaid and then losing all your assets - the American Dream.
Like I said people choose unassisted suicide by not getting treated because they don't want their families to lose everything.
But making sure premiums for the rest are lower is worth the price.
This is why pools funded by taxpayers are far superior - because people don't lose all their assets just because they got really sick.
20 posted on 03/26/2017 10:05:26 PM PDT by BellaMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: BellaMac

My mistake, I shouldn’t have mentioned Medicaid or Medicare at all.

My view is that the pre-existing conditions should be placed in a high risk pool funded by gov’t, charged a fraction of their income as premium, and their medical costs paid- end of story.


21 posted on 03/26/2017 10:28:41 PM PDT by Reverend Wright (the snowflakes are having a meltdown !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson