In the hearing he is under oath I would hope he speaks truthfully, but his answers are troubling.
He spoke truthfully and his answers are not troubling in the least......
If he answered he wanted to overturn Roe v Wade, he would have been required to recuse himself when the case came before the court....
Not to mention he would never be confirmed
So effectively, by stating he will follow the law when considering a previous ruling, he now is open to consider new cases.....
These kind of questions of Supreme Court nominees are simply trap questions....to either bury their appointment or remove them from considering a case....
Don’t matter now, he’s all but in, and you and I can’t do squat about it.