Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bk1000

The Senate’s constitutional duty is Advice and Consent. Their “advice” can surely be to “not consent” to allow review of a candidate. The Dems are using word play, as they often do. Can you just imagine what they would have done if George W. had tried to appoint 3 Supremes?


44 posted on 03/24/2017 10:52:18 AM PDT by Doche2X2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Doche2X2

Point is, it is not without precedent. Many presidents have been denied SCOTUS nominations in their last year in office. Even Schumer held this view, until recently that is. The Dems are so butt hurt and pouty I bet they would filibuster Garland if Trump nominated him. They are children throwing a tantrum. Trump will do well to ignore them much as a parent will not indulge a child’s temper tantrum. Let them hold their breath. They’ll just get a headache and regret it later.


47 posted on 03/24/2017 11:14:06 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson