South Dakota and other right thinking states ought ban travel to San Francisco merely on the basis of the danger to the public health.
Hmmmm. I think I’ll start a letter writing campaign to our state reps demanding the same bathroom laws as SD.
OK, so why would a San Francisco employee go to South Dakota for government business in the first place?
And frankly, why would anybody in South Dakota want someone from San Francisco visiting?
Oh how I wish California would ban any of their people from leaving that ‘illegal alien’ State, do us all a favor...if you like California and the way it is, please stay there, we don’t need your ‘insane ideas’ spreading around America...
However they do travel on junkets to countries like China where there are no gay rights at all.
Why do South Dakota city employees want to work in San Franscisco Bars? I’m confused, maybe I should read the article naw!
I guess South Dakota bars aren't diverse enough for San Francisco city employees.
Seems mute. Can’t imagine why a city employee would need to go to SD on city business. But, hey, the Gay Bay is all about AtTeNtIoN.
I thought the title said Frisco bars travel to South Dakota. I thought that made sense that they’d need to drug South Dakotans to get them to accept that hideousness.
I don’t your average San Francisco resident could find South Dakota on the map if it wasn’t for the pipeline protests.
Well, I don’t think we should let our dollars travel to San Francisco, either! So there!
That’s right - if you work in San Francisco - you only have the freedoms and rights that they say you should have.
If it were me, I’d get another job. (Well, if it were me, I wouldn’t be working in that town, anyway.)
SF was my father’s (RIP) favorite town till the thought police destroyed it.
Headline sounds like San Francisco bars can’t go to North Dakota. No Beers on Wheels for them.
I’d say this is a win/lose for South Dakota and San Fransicko, respectively.
Remember the good ol’ days when state marriage redefinition bills included “religious liberty” in their titles?
They were lying.
Let’s see them boycott the economic power house of Texas when we pass our no-tranny law.
I’d like to ask the butt-hurt leftists crying in their quiche what they think this law actually does. As usual, they are misrepresenting the reality of it.
It ALLOWS adoption agencies to set their own rules with regard to adopting out kids under their authority. It doesn’t “ban” anything.
Does the ninth circus approve?