“Hannity stated that he would back whoever the Republican would be”
We’re not simply talking about backing the nominee. One can back the nominee and still fight him/her on issues of principle. Hannity is not a man of principle. Nap is.
“Hannity is not a man of principle. Nap is.”
You mean like when Napolitano wrote that op-ed in the Washington Times during the general election campaign stating that there was no difference between Trump and Hillary Clinton and made it clear he wasn’t voting for Trump? Forgive me if I prefer Hannity’s principles.
Are you upset that Hannity’s been extremely critical of the GOP Congress, especially for not getting Trump’s agenda and nominees through in a speedy way (”the speed of Trump” he calls it)? Or did you not know that—because it certainly seems like you don’t really listen to what Hannity says? But after all why let the reality that Hannity is more critical of the Republican establishment and has been more supportive of Trump than another other show host on TV (except perhaps Lou Dobbs) get in the way of unfounded attacks on him...But yeah, he would have supported any Republican nominee over Hillary (as the vast majority of conservatives would have), so let’s eat up one of our best champions.