Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timpanagos1
All the bartender has to say is, “I did not care about his hat, but under my discretion, the person in question appeared to be visibly intoxicated.”

But the bartender didn't offer any such excuse did he? Thus, the existing controversy and the hopefully successful lawsuit.................Sheesh, what's the matter with you?

101 posted on 03/19/2017 4:32:37 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (My once 6 pack abs are now a keg......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Hot Tabasco

“But the bartender didn’t offer any such excuse did he? Thus, the existing controversy and the hopefully successful lawsuit.................Sheesh, what’s the matter with you?”

While that is the opinion of Mr. Piatek, It does not appear that the bartender has been deposed in this case.

When and if the bartender is deposed, I suspect they will say that Mr. Piatek appeared to be intoxicated.

Mr. Piatek is unlikely to prove, that in the professional opinion of the bartender, he did not appear to be visibly intoxicated.


104 posted on 03/19/2017 5:05:52 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson