Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alas Babylon!

Justice Thomas just had to deny a petition for a writ of certiorari in this case on 3/6/2017

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/16-122_1b7d.pdf


28 posted on 03/18/2017 8:57:21 PM PDT by stylin19a (Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: stylin19a
I think the key to the document is what Justice Thomas writes in the closing paragraph:

Unfortunately, petitioner raises her due process arguments for the first time in this Court. As a result, the Texas Court of Appeals lacked the opportunity to address them in the first instance. I therefore concur in the denial of certiorari. Whether this Court’s treatment of the broad modern forfeiture practice can be justified by the narrow historical one is certainly worthy of consideration in greater detail.

29 posted on 03/19/2017 4:35:17 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson