So, now could say a district judge stop the wall building, citing “perceived” animus Trump has against Hispanics?
The case is centered on a muslim legally residing in the US. The claim is her ‘religious rights’ are violated because her relative (also muslim) would be banned from entry. In addition her relative is seeking refugee status.
The judge is saying as long as a ‘person’ is legally residing in the US, their (religious) constitution rights extend to their relatives.
SO to your point. If the hispanic was here legally and a Muslim, then their entire family cannot be denied entry.
Or stop any military action against any muslim majority country.