Replies

No what you said was you presumed the CDC would chime in ...that’s hardly saying it would be leaked

You ASS-Umed that I meant chime in with acknowledgment that he's a patient and with his test results. I did not say that at all. YOU made that leap. Perhaps you should consider not doing that if you're going to troll people. It makes you look like an amateur. Like I said, people like you amuse me.

Also, based on your first assumption, you then assumed I knew nothing about HIPAA and its associated legal requirements and intricate restrictions when dealing with patient confidentiality matters. Another mistake.

If you, John Doe, were to tell the whole wide world that you visited or had contact with a doctor or health care agency, and you were making an outrageous claim about a service they did not provide, the same principle would apply to the doctor or health care agency you were lying about. If you were not their patient, then they would have every legal right to publicly deny your outrageous claim. That would be their legal right. (If you look this up, remember to add that extra "A" onto the end of "HIPAA" so you get quality search results).

If the doctor or health care agency wanted to stay out of the world's limelight and avoid a public spectacle, as I stated, they would probably "leak" that denial of services rendered rather than call a press conference or even publishing a press release. I would think one of the world's premier agencies such as the CDC wouldn't go looking for a microphone to deny an outrageous claim by a man most people don't know exists.

Roger Stone went public with his claim on Jan 17, three days before Obama left office on Jan 20 (and MANY more days before Trump took over control of the CDC). My claim dealt with my thought that if Stone's claim was false, Obama's CDC would not hesitate to call up their media sycophants to leak the story that Roger was lying. If you weren't so sloppy with your trolling, you would have avoided assuming you knew exactly what I was saying. A troll who knew his craft would have asked first. If you're being paid, you should hope you're not closely monitored.

Where has Stone provided even one document t about this? He hasn’t.

How are you able to monitor every single media outlet -- including print, television, and radio -- on a 24-hours basis since Jan 17 to be 100% sure that Roger Stone or his representative has not published or released or provided some kind of proof of what he is claiming? We all know the answer: You CAN'T know for sure unless you've been in contact with Roger Stone or his legal representative yourself. Are you saying you have done this?

You're coming across as being obsessed with this man. Again, a rookie troll mistake. And I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you may be a hired troll. If you are not, then just between me, you, and the fencepost, you have some major i-s-s-u-e-s with this man.

Oh, and one other assumption you've made: Not once have I said I believe Roger Stone's claim. As I stated in 53, I'm still waiting for proof.

By the way what was the name of the driver of the car that hit his car?

Why would anyone want to know that? Are we about to go down another obsessive rabbit trail? I'm game, but you should know I don't live here. You may be waiting a few days for a reply. Go for it. Amuse us some more.