Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Hydrazine

A interesting study in historical trivia would be to find out why the chemical known as “lye” (lute, pa Norsk) came to be associated with the restoration to an edible condition Atlantic codfish that has been gutted, dried (by exposure to the sun (Yes, Old Sol), in times past, then restored to an edible condition by soaking in water to eliminate the lye (sodium/potassium hydroxide, I believe it to be, primarily) and the very practical reasons for thusly managing huge amounts of codfish in order that Norse folk (a few of them my ancestors) might survive the winter season. With modern mechanical refrigeration the use of lye for preservation no longer really applies.
Ergo, I surmise that what is today marketed as lutefisk is codfish that have been gutted, washed and as quickly as practicable preserved entirely by means of modern, electrically powered refrigeration.


72 posted on 03/11/2017 4:51:53 PM PST by Elsiejay (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Elsiejay

Why didn’t they salt it instead?


76 posted on 03/11/2017 4:55:46 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson