Posted on 03/10/2017 6:41:16 PM PST by mdittmar
Edited on 03/11/2017 7:28:05 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
I’m reading it as the judge slammed down the new ban...am I correct?
**********************************************************
No you are not correct. This order applies to ONE INDIVIDUAL seeking to bring his wife to America.
Read the LAST paragraph in the story and you will see the Judge (from Washington State) who stopped the original EO has REFUSED to stop the ban created by his latest EO.
“In a related development on Friday, the federal judge in Seattle who imposed a nationwide injunction on enforcement of the original travel ban refused a request to apply that order to the revised policy, saying that lawyers from states opposed to the measure needed to file more extensive court”
Reuters are lairs like all the other lying leftist media.
It is an INVASION BAN.
Meanwhile Trump should ignore the unconstitutional court ruling citing Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution which mandates the feds to protect from invasion (illegal immigration and immigration of enemies is invasion) and, because the ruling is unconstitutional, should, like Lincoln once did, reject the ruling and proceed with his order.
This title makes it sound like Trump’s ban was dealt a setback, when it is the opposers to the ban who were.
The editors at Reuters are stupid.
[The handwriting was if this judge issued a halt to the newest EO be would be facing impeachment and removal...]
One less unjust liberal judge may lead to one more just conservative judge who are marked by following Congressional law in our Constitutional republic. Liberal judges are unjust because they overturn Congressional law and believe in their hearts they rule the country. Such unjust judges are unconstitutional and neither respect God nor man.
The headline seems to have it backwards. It looks like OPPONENTS of the ban had their first court setback.
Trump hasn’t even been in office 2 months yet. Relax.
FUBAR reporting from the AyePee, as expected. Madison, eh? No surprise there.
Judge Conley is an Obama pick. What else would you expect of him?
My limited understanding is that the Wisconsin ruling applies to the plaintiff’s suit ONLY.
LOL, I’ll provide a 9mm for the job.
The process needs to be quicker. Arrest them and have a plane ready to fly them the hell out of the Country in the same damn day before they have a chance to run to the courts.
Operation Presto.....as in gone instantly.
[Trump should ignore the unconstitutional court ruling citing Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution which mandates the feds to protect from invasion (illegal immigration and immigration of enemies is invasion) and, because the ruling is unconstitutional, should, like Lincoln once did, reject the ruling and proceed with his order.]
Yes, you hit the nail on the head.
Just let that North Korean nuke hit anywhere in Kalifornia... if it were a MIV it could get the entire left coast! Then cite Obama cuts and policies that “dictated” the president be notified before returning fire....
HE COULD ADD JUDGES to the Supreme Court just like FDR tried to do....and since he has the house and senate there is nothing stopping him. He could do the same to lower courts.
In 1936, President Roosevelt issued a proposal in February 1937 to provide retirement at full pay for all members of the court over 70. If a justice refused to retire, an “assistant” with full voting rights was to be appointed, thus ensuring a pro FDR majority.
Trump can do it without an amendment.
First he needs to nuke the filibuster. Should have been done the 40 days ago.
It is unfair for Republicans to do the same things Democrats do.
REPUBLICANS are hard headed.
It is unfair for Republicans to do the same things Democrats do.
REPUBLICANS are hard headed.
The people at issue are on foreign soil, not stopped at our airports. The one judge issued a ‘stay’ for a specific family but the question remains whether those family members actually have all the needed documents. Given that, how can a judge force the executive branch to issue those documents to foreigners on foreign soil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.