“Pruitt’s view is contrary to mainstream climate science, including NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the EPA itself.”
Right. The problem is, those organizations have for years been on the receiving end of various forms of federal largess, in the form of research grants and funding that have come from biased politicians who have an agenda to “take the US economic powerhouse down a notch”.
[[“Pruitt’s view is contrary to mainstream climate science, including NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the EPA itself.”]]
And they have also been caught lying and cheating in order to boost their ridiculous claims- caught red handed- making up numbers out of thin air- They just got caught creating new numbers out of thin air- The satellite data showed that there had been no warming for nearly 20 years- so what did NASA do? They claimed one of their data satellites ‘drifted off course’ - I kid you not- and they ‘recalculated’ what the ‘real temperatures’ should have been’- and by golly they now showed warming during those 20 years-
These are the kinds of liars and con artists we’re dealing with- and of course Mann and ilk were caught lying and intimidating scientists who didn’t agree too back awhile- and their terra bound temperature stations are intentionally placed in spots like paved parking lots, next to massive air conditioning units that emit heat- etc- there was a fella that went around snapping photos of the temp stations-
These folks claiming man is responsible are liars- Marc Morano has a whole site dedicated to scientific evidence exposing the lies- climatedepot.org I believe-