[bigbob]

It’s an interesting study in political paranoia as well:

On one hand, the Clintonistas were nervous enough about Hillary losting to engage in what seems to be very risky acts to try to damage Trump, but on the other they did these things under the assumption that Hillary would win, thus making sure they were never discovered.

But if they were confident she would win, why do them?

[LS]

The standard response is insurance to see she would win.

[txhurl]

But if they were confident she would win, why do them?

---

Probably because the camp had to maintain three degrees of separation from the actual blackbox hacking crews (vote counting code) and precinct double-counters of the same boxes of ballots, for plausible deniability. They wouldn’t know until 10p election night if the fixes made it in.

Something happened for those fraud missions to abort... O’Keefe? I also suspect these vote fraud tactics were installed in dozens of nations and displayed to work... except maybe in Britain.