Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
Well, the one who GAVE THEM THE INFORMATION committed the felony and that person’s identity needs to be discovered.

The Times or the Post or any other news agency cannot be prosecuted for receiving the information under the first amendment.

Agreed. I should have been more careful in clarifying that.

48 posted on 03/08/2017 8:32:02 AM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: meyer

But let’s not forget that the Obama DOJ asserted just that in their justification for the warrant to wiretap James Rosen... that the act of a journalist soliciting classified information was criminal. I’m assuming all of the ‘journalists’ that have ‘checked with their well-placed sources inside the intelligence community’’ for the existence of FISA warrants are currently under surveillance then? After all, isn’t that soliciting classified information?


50 posted on 03/08/2017 9:01:37 AM PST by leakinInTheBlueSea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson