So, Allahpundit, it must be perfectly legal to make public the words of the party that was NOT the target. That must be part of the law, written right into it: ‘if you intercept the words of an innocent American, NOT the target, that half of the conversation can be freely shared with any Leftist news outlet—providing the innocent party is a conservative.’
If not, surely the intelligent, sophisticated Allahpundit would have noted by how egregiously the existing law was broken.
Bol.
RE: So, Allahpundit, it must be perfectly legal to make public the words of the party that was NOT the target.
I don’t think that was the point of the article. The point of AllahPundit’s article was simply to show WHO the target of the surveillance really was.
The leak to the press itself is illegal and whoever did it must be discovered and prosecuted.