Posted on 03/01/2017 4:39:56 PM PST by drewh
Lets talk about the bra strap dress that Ivanka Trump wore to her fathers first address to a joint session of Congress last night, a pink, one-shouldered number reportedly by French designer Roland Mouret. Its boudoir-ish black strap was meant to look like a bra strap, of course, and it heightened the sex appeal of Ivankas bare-shoulder look, which was perhaps better suited for date night than a speech in Congress. It was an unconventional choice for such a serious occasion, which made it all the more un-Ivanka. Since moving to Washington, shes glammed it up for black-tie affairs like the Governors Ball and the Alfalfa Dinner, but has otherwise dressed on the conservative side, particularly for meetings and appearances alongside her father. This is in keeping with the old Ivankathe #WomenWhoWork entrepreneur whose own fashion line bills itself as appropriately sexy. The old Ivanka would have likely chosen something safer and more traditional for a Capital Hill gathering where both chambers of commerce heard the president discuss budgets, foreign policy, and health care. Instead, she opted for a dress that Emily Ratajkowski, the chesty actress known for her less-is-more approach to dressing, might go for if she wanted to look modest. Or that Courtney Love would have worn to the Grammys ten years ago. It looked all wrong on Ivanka, surrounded as she was by Democratic Congresswomen in white suiting (the color is meant to represent womens suffrage) and demurely dressed, seasoned politicos. First Lady Melania Trump also stood out in a Dynasty-esque, embellished black Michael Kors ensemblemore 1985 cocktail party than 2017 Congressional attire. But this seemed less out of step for Melania, who hasnt been in the political spotlight as much as the presidents daughter, and who isnt afraid to court the wow factor in her choice of outfitsas per her audacious Jackie Kennedy-style get-up worn on Inauguration Day. Ivanka, on the other hand, has long been known for having a more one-note, mainstream fashion sense. Indeed, there is nothing hip or offbeat about her eponymous clothing line, which she has worn more often than not over the years, including throughout her fathers campaign. This helped her come across as an extension of her brand, which is creatively uninspiring but features plenty of serviceable, feminine basics in muted pinks and flower prints. Now that shes no longer selling that image, the new Ivanka seems to be struggling to find her sartorial stride in her role as unofficial adviser and advocate for womens economic empowerment in the Trump administration. Take, for instance, the black choker she wore with a red and black blazer earlier Tuesday in the Oval Office, while President Trump signed a pair of bills that encourage women to enter fields like environmental sciences and information technology. (Gender diversity in #STEM is key to empowering women & girls. @realDonaldTrump signed two bills bringing us closer to #ClosingTheGenderGap, Ivanka tweeted of the occasion, along with a picture of herself and other women surrounding the president.)
Ivanka has worn chokers in the past, but they hardly suit her style. The 90s throwback necklace saw a trend resurgence last year and was spotted on the Kendall Jenner and Bella Hadid types at Coachella, which is about as far from Ivankas scene as Williamsburg. The rocker-chic, goth princess look isnt suited to an Upper East Side real estate heiress turned fashion entrepreneur, particularly one who has looked and played that part to an exacting degree. The bills Trump signed are geared towards younger women, and Ivanka seemed to be striving to appeal to that demographic with her ribbon-like neck accessory. But the effect was too try-hard, and the choker looked particularly strange paired with her boxy red blazer.
The color-block skirt that Ivanka wore while visiting Boeings headquarters in South Carolina several weeks back was a statement-making piece that drew attention to the first daughters presence that day. Aesthetically, this was one of the more creative separates Ivanka has ever worn. It also seemed an unsubtle suggestion that, despite claiming shed only act as a daughter in the White House, Ivanka is an increasingly prominent political force in her fathers administration. Ivanka looks most like herself when she dresses more classicallyin pointy-toed black flats, fitted black slacks, and a black turtleneck, for instance, while playing with her son in the White House.
Perhaps its unfair, as Trump would say, to parse and harshly judge some of the first daughters recent sartorial decisions. She has thrown herself into her new role as unofficial adviser to the president and an advocate for womens economic empowerment in the Trump administration. We dont know whether she will be the leveling force on her father as foreseen by some. But her fashion missteps indicate that shes struggling to navigate her transition from real estate mogul and fashion entrepreneur to political operative.
The eas were discreetly covered and I couldn’t detect a hint of nithibg.
A bit sexual, which I am sure was the designer’s intent. How many of those designers that refused to dress the first family were saying “ooh, I wish I designed that!”
She is a beautiful woman, comfortable with her own sexuality. Contrast her dress with anything the skanks of Hollywood were wearing on the red carpet, with their blatant display of body parts.
Or for that matter, contrast her with any of the “witches in white sans hoods.”
Um, could be pre children.
Exactly. And again, whike I would have chosen something a bit more conservative /traditional she is a standout and gorgeous and certainly more apkropri5tgan the slants in white. Btw.. I wonder if they realize the suffragettes were, for the most part, if not all Republican hahaha!!
Worth repeating
Yes, it is. Thanks.
Flour sack... Better!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.