You’re burying yourself, Bill.
In his blog, Adams has really been doing a great job of exposing the fallacies of the whole climate change debate for months now. This article is a great demonstration of much of what he’s been saying and Nye provides all the evidence for him.
I saw that last night. Nye seemed to have mental bReaktor in the last few minutes, just like Mr. Adams said. I mean like a obvious WTH type mental break.
That interview was epic, and I’ve seen most all of Tucker’s interviews of assorted leftwing nuts. Nye doesn’t do so well when he’s not reading from a script pretending to be the “Science Guy”. Tucker got him so riled up, the junk-science guy coming across as downright creepy at the end.
Damn shame Professor Proton didn’t finish him off when he had a chance.
Bill Nye...the idiot guy.
I heard Nye make a point that coastal areas will be inundated and that the interior of the U.S. will be flooded in a warming scenario.
That’s true. But you know what he left out? The polar areas will go from frozen wastelands to productive forests. Global temperatures will likely be more moderate as a result of increased evaporation and humidity.
We don’t have to wonder what global warming looks like. Here it is, in the Cretaceous, with NO polar ice at all and with flora and fauna populating Antarctica.
https://australianmuseum.net.au/image/map-of-world-late-cretaceous
Global warming already happened—10 degrees by all accounts—and the results were not as dire as folks are making it out to be.
Biggest fraud around...after obozo
CERN, the world’s top particle physics laboratory, just found that our big, abrupt climate changes are produced by variations in the sun’s activity. That’s the same sun the modelers had dismissed as “unchanging.” CERN says the sun’s variations interact with cosmic rays to create more or fewer of earth’s heat-shielding clouds. The IPCC had long admitted it couldn’t model clouds--and now the CERN experiment says the clouds are the earth’s thermostats!
Wow, and I thought Obama talked in circles
I watched that last night and almost had a heart attack laughing so hard at that Nye fruitcake sputtering and having fits over Carlson stabbing him with the truth every time he opened his lying mouth. What an IDIOT! I guess the bow-tie was an indicator as to just how bad the match was going to be.
Carlson literally ripped him to pieces and spit him out. At the end of the torture session Nye was simply mumbling some foreign babbling and looked like he was going to cry.
Viticulture and winemaking in England and Wales boasts a long and rich history. From pre-Roman times to the present day, there has been winegrowing in Britain. These pages will outline a bit more about this long and fruitful history.
http://www.englishwineproducers.co.uk/background/history/
Nye isn’t even close to being a scientist:
The first job of a scientist is to prove himself wrong.
Big Lie, the Pseudoscience Guy.
Battle of the Bowties. Tucker wins!!
bkmk
I’m in Omaha. Even if the planet is warming (hey, we’re coming out of an ice age dumb*sses), why would we want to stop that?
I hate the cold winters. I want it to get WARM.
And CO2 is plant food, so if you are against CO2, you are against plants, and therefore you are a specieist.
So...there. Have a nice day. :-)
ExxonMobil “Our position on climate change”
http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/current-issues/climate-policy/climate-perspectives/our-position
“The risk of climate change is clear and the risk warrants action. Increasing carbon emissions in the atmosphere are having a warming effect. There is a broad scientific and policy consensus that action must be taken to further quantify and assess the risks.”
So the debate isn’t if climate change exists or if fossil fuels (carbon emissions) are changing the climate, but now the debate is what percentage of climate change is caused by man?
Exxon Mobil is ordered to hand over climate change research
LA Times, 12 Jan 2017
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-exxon-mobil-climate-change-documents-20170112-story.html
“A Massachusetts judge has ordered Exxon Mobil to submit 40 years of documents regarding the company’s studies of the impact of fossil fuels on climate change. ...to pursue questions about whether Exxon Mobil misled the public about the role fossil fuels play in climate change.”
Like the tobacco industry “...internal company documents suggested that during the 1980s and 1990s the company used climate research as part of its planning and other business practices but simultaneously argued publicly that climate change science was not clear-cut.”
Like the tobacco industry “Exxon Mobil has rejected allegations that it suppressed climate change research...”