Milo is right, and this is a huge issue for me. Young teen kids, either gay boys or all girls, who are left unsupervised as they come into their sexuality, become prey to unscrupulous adults. The gay community needs to really speak out on this more, but I suspect they don’t because (maybe like Milo) many of them were introduced to sex by a “kindly” older gay man.
On FR, the men hoot and chortle over a teen boy being sexually abused by an older, hot teacher, but straight guys don’t get abused by adults as much (except for some who do get abused by gay men). Gay boys and straight girls are easier to convince that the relationship with a Svengali type of adult is “love.” And some end up as prostitutes or worse.
Milo is being honest. This happens to many young teen kids. He should not be disinvited for telling the truth about older pedophilia and how teens don’t understand that these adults are wrong.
“I am a gay man, and a child abuse victim.
He suffers from same-sex attraction disorder *because* he is a victim of homosexual molestation.
It is the trauma of molestation or seduction in the pre-adult years that induces same-sex attraction disorder.
Milo responded to everything on facebook... I’m with Milo on this one.
Screw CPAC. Milo explained it well on Facebook. CPAC, like much of the GOP and so-called “conservatives” - have no balls nor loyalty.
Regardless of gay or straight, anyone representing conservative views should be ostracized for advocating pedophilia or anything else revolting to conservative values.
btt
On one hand I am (more than) a little uncomfortable when Milo plays the “fairy” but on the other hand I think it makes him a more effective anti-liberal when a profoundly gay man aggressively lectures liberals on the insanity and hypocrisy of the liberal agenda.
I figured that had to happen.
I always see the name Milo in the news.
Afraid to google it.
Should I?
Just saw video: He was being interviewed by somebody being aggressive and trying to find something wrong with him...and he was being very forthcoming and open. He volunteered that he had given head to a catholic priest after he had reached puberty but was still young enough to be in school. The interviewer tried to nail him down on his age and suggested 14, and Milo entertained that he may have been that age without clarifying. What Milo made clear was that he was the one that was seeking to give head to the priest and not the other way around. He refused to out the priest because he did not want the priest in trouble.. He also voiced some suspicion about pedophillia may have been going on other places based on a lot of young boys being about, I think he meant Hollywood but not sure, because but he apparently did not want to name who he was suspicious about. Its not clear if he had any hard evidence worth making an accusation over.
And this got twisted into him defending the practice of pedophillia by being conflated with him defending alleged pedophiles by not wanting to name names.
If such equivocal logic is valid, then all leftists who defend Islam are guilty of advocating the common sex crimes of Islam, including rampant pedophilia, honor killings, and the rape game. In short, it makes just about the entire Left, rape apologists.
I’ve never understood the appeal of this guy to any conservative - how is homoeroticism so appealing to conservatives? Went to his YouTube page recently as I’ve never followed this guy all that closely and well, he’s kind of out there.
Although the insanity of the Left at Berkely in going on a violent rampage of vandalism simply because he was going to show up and speak from a stage did make him seem quite sensible by comparison.
Thanks. I will avoid any further research. :)
CPAC are Globalist dogs, Milo is a warrior for Free speech. Easy one, I back Milo.
"In the homosexual world, particularly, some of those relationships between younger boys and older men — the sort of ‘coming of age’ relationship — those relationships in which those older men help those young boys discover who they are and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable, sort of rock, where they can’t speak to their parents."
Yeah, I wonder what percentage of "homosexual" young boys were helped to "discover who they were" by adult pedophiles. I'm betting the percentage is VERY high.
I really can't support Milo in his thinking this is a good thing.
Our entire culture has become over-sexualized and the trend to push these experiences onto children, at younger and younger ages, is horrific and destructive, both to them and to society as a whole.
I am absolutely not defending Milo in his comments but am simply saying that we, as parents and grown-ups, need to take a really good look at what we are allowing and even encouraging in our own lives. The media we watch, the books we read, the conversations we have, the curriculum in our schools, are all pushing for earlier sexual activity. There have always been adults who find children sexually attractive and the level of acceptance we are now allowing is wrong and must be addressed!
We do not value the inherent worth of each individual but have become self-centered, deceived and “lovers of pleasure”. We need to quit pretending that there are no moral standards, out of fear of being labeled “intolerant”. We have glossed over this issue for far too long and it needs to be addressed before we lose another generation.
Praying that this controversy will bring about hard, but necessary, conversations about this issue and our responsibility as adults to protect our children from predators (of both sexes) who prey on them, both young girls and young boys! This issue is being ignored in too many quarters - the military, public (and private) schools, the church, Hollywood, political interns, Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, just to name a few. And we need to take a good look at our own lives to see if we have ignored things that we know are wrong out of fear of repercussions if we speak truth! Also praying for Milo, who is clearly battling his own past and needs to find healing and wholeness from the wounds done to him!
Anyone shocked by someone in the homosexual lifestyle, telling the truth about the homosexual lifestyle is just showing how ignorant they are of the homosexual lifestyle.
While he doesn’t say explicitly the younger boys are underage in his statement the worship and predation of youth by a very pronounced segment of homosexuals, particularly male homosexuals is as inalienable a fact as the sun coming up in the east.
The political correctness mantra that homosexuals are innocuous and the same as everyone else is not remotely true. There are some disgusting features of human nature that are not merely part of homosexuality but worshipped and revered by it.. particularly among male homosexuals.
The male sexuality, untempered by the tempering nature of the female will and does take individuals into abhorrent and dark places. Stuck in teenage maturity forever seeking male approval etc. It is a predatory and dangerous lifestyle and it worships and encourages some of the worst traits of mankind.
Milo is a threat to the GOPe, so he had to be ‘removed’.
I just read through this thread, I’m surprised at the number of people who were willing to convict Milo without even looking at his side. I read his Facebook page and I really don’t see that he was advocating pedophilia in any way.
I judge my friends on who they are inside, I’ve never cared about anything else. I really am not interesting in hearing about what goes on behind closed doors of gay friends, but to be honest, I don’t care to hear the details about what goes on in the bedrooms of my straight friends either.
I watched the YouTube video of Milo in his Pro-Life talk at one of the universities, he was one of the most terrific speakers I have ever heard, he was funny, engaging, and go more information to those young people than anyone I have ever seen.
Milo was effectively preaching conservatism on college campuses around the nation, and the Romney/Levin/Globalist wing of the GOP couldn’t have that. CPAC would’ve been happier with Hillary in the White House.
To all those on the, Taliban wing of Freerepublic, shall we also condemn the works of homosexuals? Do you destroy the “Mona Lisa” or the statue “David”or buildings that were designed and built by, “those people”?
In my marriage party was a homosexual friend of mine! Shall I now after 40+ years of a GREAT marriage, should I divorce my wife?
For those Talibaners, who wish to negatively reply, Do Not Mistake Me For Someone Who Gives a S—t What You Do or Think.