Skip to comments.
Why Was the FBI Investigating General Flynn?
National Review ^
| 2/18/17
| Andrew C. McCarthy
Posted on 02/18/2017 5:22:42 AM PST by randita
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Long read, but pretty much concludes that there was no valid reason for the FBI grilling Flynn in the first place and that it was indeed a crime to leak details about the call to the press.
1
posted on
02/18/2017 5:22:42 AM PST
by
randita
To: randita
Unless Flynn was collateral to another and more important investigation already underway - one for which he was not the target. Perhaps that’s why he was cleared so quickly.
We have no idea what was discussed, do we?
To: randita
Basically, anyone who rings up the Russian ambassador’s personal phone...probably gets an investigation. That’s my bet. Course, the FBI won’t acknowledge that.
Perhaps we should get a volunteer from audience to make the call and see if the FBI visits their house?
To: randita
domestic law enforcement (MI6)He needs to proof-read what he writes [may the god's not strike us freepers dead for our hypocrisy]. MI6 is British foreign intelligence
To: pepsionice
The “Community-Organizer-in-Chief “ was behind this. Bet on it.
5
posted on
02/18/2017 5:40:45 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
(.leave the gun, take the canolis, take it to the mattress.)
To: randita
Very good article and I hope Trump’s legal staff follows up on this.
Also, if there anybody who shod be abject to the Logan Act, it’s McCain. He’s been abroad shooting his mouth off, undercutting the Adminsitration’s foreign policy, and offering his own completely unauthorized policy instead.
6
posted on
02/18/2017 5:41:11 AM PST
by
livius
To: randita
7
posted on
02/18/2017 5:46:27 AM PST
by
gaijin
To: randita
Now, are you unhappy as I am unhappy with the Trump administrations blandishments toward the murderous, anti-American Putin regime? Sure . . . but that does not make Flynn and other Trump officials Russian agents any more than Obama is an Iranian agent. Again, political disagreement is not a rationalization for drawing a ridiculous legal conclusion (maybe hes a foreign agent) as a pretext for an investigation by the FBI.Well, this is NR, and so we should know that this was going off the rails. This isn't exactly Trump's view, which he stated so clearly in his presser.
Russia and the US are two very powerful nuclear armed countries. Armageddon is in no one's interest, and therefore it would be helpful if we could get along on things where it is in our mutual interest to get along.
And one of our big problems with Russia is the American penchant for sticking its nose in Russia's internal affairs or their well-settled sphere of influence. It's part of our busy-body approach to international affairs. It's in our blood, like going to the Puritan vicar and telling him that you saw a married couple in his parish having non-missionary position sex or something.
To: randita
Oh, perhaps Flynn was conducting a sting for his CIC so they could release transcripts slightly variant from each other and so that they would be able to identify who the real “leaker” of intel was to the Washington Compost or wherever they leaked it...added cover by having him fired made them even more bold...now the big question is...NOW that Trump knows WHO you are will he frog march you into custody or use you later with this leverage agasint you. In the meantime General Flynn will probably be a close advisor the POTUS for which he needs no Senate approval.
Makes sense to me in a fake news world
Freegards
LEX
To: randita
I hope Jason Chaffetz surprises us with an effective investigation of the government’s conduct in this matter, and exposes the Obama plot behind it.
President Trump should declassify and release the pertinent parts of Flynn’s conversations in both recorded form and as “transcripts”. It’s not exactly a secret that the calls were recorded, and Amb. Kislyak presumably knows what he talked about.
Better yet, President Putin should publish the recordings of the same conversations made by the Russian side.
To: randita
11
posted on
02/18/2017 6:02:31 AM PST
by
SunTzuWu
To: randita
12
posted on
02/18/2017 6:08:18 AM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
To: randita
Ex post facto considerations. Do the communications before the new guidelines were implemented fall under this change?
13
posted on
02/18/2017 6:11:36 AM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
To: randita
Too many partisan politicians in positions of National Security and Intelligence - Trump knew this going in and his statements about returning power to the People were not coincidental events. He was forewarning those who would be petty tyrants, within the government and outside the law, that their time is limited.
God protect President Trump.
14
posted on
02/18/2017 6:25:32 AM PST
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: randita
Why is Comey still there?
15
posted on
02/18/2017 6:33:55 AM PST
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Chewbarkah
I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for that weak sister
16
posted on
02/18/2017 6:35:46 AM PST
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: randita
The FBIs guidelines for domestic operations strike the right balance: The FBI should . . . operate openly and consensually with U.S. persons to the extent practicable when collecting foreign intelligence that does not concern criminal activities or threats to the national security.The guidelines...pdf format...https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3283349/Raw-12333-surveillance-sharing-guidelines.pdf
(U) SECTION VI - DISSEMINATION
B. (U) Criteria for dissemination of USPI.
Subject to paragraph A and to paragraphs C, D, and E below, an IC element may disseminate USPI derived solely from raw SIGINT covered by these Procedures only if one of the following conditions is met, and if a high-level official as specified in the MOA determines that the recipient has a need for the USPI in the performance of his or her official duties:
1. (U) Consent. The U.S. person has consented to the dissemination of (i) communications to, from, or about him or her, (ii) data related to such communications, or (iii) information about him or her, and has executed an appropriate consent form.
I doubt Flynn gave consent.
17
posted on
02/18/2017 6:36:26 AM PST
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
To: randita
Trump should have put Flynn and Pence in a room to iron out differences. A strong admonishment (in private) of Flynn would have sufficed. Firing Flynn a big mistake, it gave the MSM blood in the water.
18
posted on
02/18/2017 6:41:14 AM PST
by
kenmcg
To: AndyJackson
I like McCarthy but that is a blatant error.
19
posted on
02/18/2017 6:43:22 AM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
("It's a war against humanity!" Donald J. Trump)
To: randita
Part of the “barium meal”.
20
posted on
02/18/2017 7:01:41 AM PST
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson