It’s not liberal BS to believe that supervisors are legally liable for the abuse they heap upon subordinates. That woman should never have been in a position of authority over another human being. She took joy in degrading and humiliating that poor kid. Actions have consequences. Believing that actions don’t have consequences is what is liberal BS.
The consequences should be that she can’t keep any employees from walking off the job.
Her bosses look at her turnover and fire her.
OH WAIT THAT WILL MAKE HER KILL HERSELF OH NOESSSSS WON’T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILLLLLLLDREN?!?!
This boy, while a sad case, never learned from his parents how to deal with adversity, no doubt due to the “participation trophy/you’re not immature, you’re autistic” treatment.
On top of that, he was under the influence of that mental poison known as social media.
None of what you said in this thread is applicable.
No, the liberal BS is from you. It is liberal BS that says supervisors are legally liable for verbal abuse — physical abuse, yes, verbal no. And yes actions have consequences. The kid could have gone to his supervisors supervisor, he could have quit etc. And, the supervisor could have been fired if warranted. But it is complete liberal BS to say legal liability for verbal abuse.