To: az_gila
Would not using a six bladed prop be lighter and less complex than two counter rotating 3 bladed props and thus be more efficient, even with the torque issues?
40 posted on
02/16/2017 11:19:39 AM PST by
Fraxinus
(My opinion, worth what you paid.)
To: Fraxinus
Would not using a six bladed prop be lighter and less complex than two counter rotating 3 bladed props and thus be more efficient, even with the torque issues?
Not sure, but this wiki article gives a brief explanation. It seems the gain is by the air exiting the prop swept area not having any rotational component.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contra-rotating_propellers
43 posted on
02/16/2017 11:53:05 AM PST by
az_gila
To: Fraxinus
If I had to guess, the counter-rotating props might add some advantage in overcoming the various effects of the GAU-8.
To: Fraxinus
Less mechanically complex, but not more efficient.
Helical propwash runs over every part of the surface. With Contra props air is kicked one way, then back and emerges (relatively) straight along the axis
![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/pbUF3.gif)
53 posted on
02/16/2017 4:56:22 PM PST by
Oztrich Boy
(I never ever set out to make anyone feel safe. - S E Hinton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson