Posted on 02/13/2017 6:06:15 PM PST by Stopthethreat
AA JEFFERSON COUNTY Written by Jeff Branick: I originally wrote this letter in October, but at the request of a friend, delayed sending it for 90 days. It is now shorter than it was originally. I grew up in Port Arthur with a grandfather, uncle, father, brother and sister who were union members and then I went to law school. My earlier experiences led me to believe, as I still do, that collective bargaining and a fair civil justice system are good things. Those experiences also led me to become a member of the Democratic Party because I believed that a large part of the genius that is America is rooted in the strength of its middle class and the opportunity for individuals of every stripe to improve their lot in life. Over the last few years, however, I have become increasingly more uncomfortable with my party's stance on a number of issues such that I can no longer count myself among its membership. I do not believe that the most significant issue facing the U.S. is climate change. And while I do view ISIS and like groups as a clear and present danger, I also believe it is an issue that can be addressed with sufficient resolve and less political correctness from our national leadership. However, it appears that our foreign policy for the last several years has been to deny that evil exists anywhere in the world other than in the bosom of a Republican. But the thing that scares me more than anything else is the fact that we have doubled our national debt in the last 8 years to almost 20 trillion dollars and we are facing unfunded liabilities (amounts for which the federal government has obligated itself but which are not yet due) of something more than 127 trillion dollars. That's 1.1 million dollars of debt for every American taxpayer. And that scares the heck out of me. How can we "secure the blessings of liberty to...our posterity" if we refuse to deal with an issue of such manifest significance? I have lost all faith that the membership of my party will do anything meaningful to deal with this most worrisome issue. Nor do I believe, as the leaders of my former party argued during this last election, that a confiscatory tax system can solve this crisis. According to my research the top 10% of wage earners in the U.S. pay about 70% of the income taxes. I think that's a fair share. And with U.S. corporate tax rates amongst the highest in the industrialized world, how can we raise those taxes without running even more jobs, and liquidity, overseas? I would agree that income inequality exists, but I would think the better way to begin to address the issue is to release individuals from lifetime and intergenerational entitlement programs that subjugate them to the will of the state and allow them to use the talents for which they are uniquely gifted by their Creator. Since the passage of the Great Society legislation 50+ years ago we have experienced more poverty, not less. As a remedial measure it seems to me to be a failure that has only had the effect of incentivizing single parent households. I'm all for helping people who are down on their luck for a few years, but I want that help to equip them to travel down a path to productivity and self-reliance. I do not believe in a cradle to grave system of public entitlements. It is economically, and in my mind morally, unsustainable. I am also one of those individuals that cling to my guns and religion. I happen to believe that the 2nd Amendment is every bit as important as all of the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights and I also believe that America was founded as a Christian nation. And while I do not wish to force others to accept my personal religious views, I also do not desire to be forced to set my personal beliefs aside every time I enter the public square. During the last eight years we have seen a regulatory environment that has, with little or no scientific basis, killed many jobs in our local area (Keystone Pipeline). We have also seen bureaucratically delayed multi-billion dollar projects that could have created thousands of high paying positions in our community. And I have been extremely dismayed to listen to leaders in my former party who have found it expedient to make law enforcement the enemy when, by and large, they are the glue that holds a civilized society together and are deserving of respect. And while I appreciate the way legal immigration has enriched our culture over the last 200 years, I find it appalling that we have ignored the rule of law with respect to illegal immigration and acted as if our borders and our sovereignty are merely suggestions devoutly to be ignored. To my Republican friends I would note that I will continue to vote for a number of our local Democratic office holders because I know them to be honorable and hard-working public servants. To my Democratic friends I would say that I do not dislike you and do not think I'm better than you. You and others, regardless of political view, will continue to be treated with dignity, respect and fairness in my courtroom. And while I will not ask you to vote for me during my next (and last) run for county judge if it does damage to your conscience, I will ask that we remain friends. Because with age I've come to realize that friendships are more important than any position I might hold.
....disastrous leadership and direction over the last 8 years...
The Democrat party is on life support. The last person leaving it’s “big tent” can pull the plug.
Unreadable, by these old eyes.
Hell no. No more RINOs in the Republican party.
Yellow Dog Democrats who’ve stuck with their party for the past 45 years need to KICK OUT THE COMMUNISTS.
Stop moving the political football LEFT as the Commies get the Rat Party and the Republicans get the former Democrats.
That’s like trying to live with cancer. It only postpones the inevitable end.
One Dumbocrat wakes up. One down 59 million to go.
Written by Jeff Branick:
I originally wrote this letter in October, but at the request of a friend, delayed sending it for 90 days. It is now shorter than it was originally.
I grew up in Port Arthur with a grandfather, uncle, father, brother and sister who were union members and then I went to law school. My earlier experiences led me to believe, as I still do, that collective bargaining and a fair civil justice system are good things. Those experiences also led me to become a member of the Democratic Party because I believed that a large part of the genius that is America is rooted in the strength of its middle class and the opportunity for individuals of every stripe to improve their lot in life.
Over the last few years, however, I have become increasingly more uncomfortable with my party's stance on a number of issues such that I can no longer count myself among its membership. I do not believe that the most significant issue facing the U.S. is climate change. And while I do view ISIS and like groups as a clear and present danger, I also believe it is an issue that can be addressed with sufficient resolve and less political correctness from our national leadership. However, it appears that our foreign policy for the last several years has been to deny that evil exists anywhere in the world other than in the bosom of a Republican. But the thing that scares me more than anything else is the fact that we have doubled our national debt in the last 8 years to almost 20 trillion dollars and we are facing unfunded liabilities (amounts for which the federal government has obligated itself but which are not yet due) of something more than 127 trillion dollars. That's 1.1 million dollars of debt for every American taxpayer. And that scares the heck out of me. How can we "secure the blessings of liberty to...our posterity" if we refuse to deal with an issue of such manifest significance? I have lost all faith that the membership of my party will do anything meaningful to deal with this most worrisome issue.
Nor do I believe, as the leaders of my former party argued during this last election, that a confiscatory tax system can solve this crisis. According to my research the top 10% of wage earners in the U.S. pay about 70% of the income taxes. I think that's a fair share. And with U.S. corporate tax rates amongst the highest in the industrialized world, how can we raise those taxes without running even more jobs, and liquidity, overseas?
I would agree that income inequality exists, but I would think the better way to begin to address the issue is to release individuals from lifetime and intergenerational entitlement programs that subjugate them to the will of the state and allow them to use the talents for which they are uniquely gifted by their Creator. Since the passage of the Great Society legislation 50+ years ago we have experienced more poverty, not less. As a remedial measure it seems to me to be a failure that has only had the effect of incentivizing single parent households. I'm all for helping people who are down on their luck for a few years, but I want that help to equip them to travel down a path to productivity and self-reliance. I do not believe in a cradle to grave system of public entitlements. It is economically, and in my mind morally, unsustainable.
I am also one of those individuals that cling to my guns and religion. I happen to believe that the 2nd Amendment is every bit as important as all of the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights and I also believe that America was founded as a Christian nation. And while I do not wish to force others to accept my personal religious views, I also do not desire to be forced to set my personal beliefs aside every time I enter the public square.
During the last eight years we have seen a regulatory environment that has, with little or no scientific basis, killed many jobs in our local area (Keystone Pipeline). We have also seen bureaucratically delayed multi-billion dollar projects that could have created thousands of high paying positions in our community. And I have been extremely dismayed to listen to leaders in my former party who have found it expedient to make law enforcement the enemy when, by and large, they are the glue that holds a civilized society together and are deserving of respect. And while I appreciate the way legal immigration has enriched our culture over the last 200 years, I find it appalling that we have ignored the rule of law with respect to illegal immigration and acted as if our borders and our sovereignty are merely suggestions devoutly to be ignored.
To my Republican friends I would note that I will continue to vote for a number of our local Democratic office holders because I know them to be honorable and hard-working public servants. To my Democratic friends I would say that I do not dislike you and do not think I'm better than you. You and others, regardless of political view, will continue to be treated with dignity, respect and fairness in my courtroom. And while I will not ask you to vote for me during my next (and last) run for county judge if it does damage to your conscience, I will ask that we remain friends. Because with age I've come to realize that friendships are more important than any position I might hold.
If it’s one I wan to read I copy paste it to a word processer and enlarge it and break it up. first. I have done it enough times that it goes quickly.
Interesting....a man of principle puts himself at risk.
Jefferson County Texas appears to be a RAT bastion.
2016 is only the 2nd time a Repub presidential candidate took the vote since 1960.
Trump won by 419 votes
Exactly. This is not political. Its principled
The old Democrat party is dead.
Thanks 0bama.
A judge, actually. I thought he would be a commissioner of some sort.
Lots of muslims in Jefferson County. Believe Hillary did a fund raiser in Beaumont.
Thanx.
Didn’t know that.
In 1983, when Phil Gramm switched parties, he resigned from the U.S. House and went through a special election, which he easily won. All the switchers should do that, resign and run in a special election. It may not be possible to do that with all offices though.
In time, Gramm became less popular as a conservative and more within the GOP-e group.
It would just seem more principled if he’d done it before the Republicans controlled the Congress, White House, and (for the time being) the Supreme Court nomination process.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.