Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim 0216
Hi Jim 0216, If the seepage is investigated and found to be within tolerable (non-destructive erosive) limits, then the issue becomes understood to where it just needs to be "monitored". However, if it is not investigated, the issue becomes an unknown risk factor (i.e. is there any destructive erosion occurring?).

Oroville dam designers included "overdesign" in the thickness, depth, and dimensions of the layers of the earthfill embankment design. Thus there is a built in safety factor. All earthfill embankment designs have seepage. They just need to be on top of anything that develops.

The problem that I have is that there is an inaction behavior that seems to be ignoring the Dam Inspectors recommendations (inferring from multiple Inspection reports).

2,773 posted on 03/29/2017 4:06:27 PM PDT by EarthResearcher333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2763 | View Replies ]


To: EarthResearcher333

What if any preferable alternatives are there to earthen-made dams of this size?


2,775 posted on 03/29/2017 4:12:04 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2773 | View Replies ]

To: EarthResearcher333

About 35 years ago, I was a state inspector of things like
landfills, drinking water plants, and wastewater treatment plants.
We wrote up our observations in reports and passed them up the line.
We never knew what action was or was not taken until that site
popped up on the inspection to-do list again a few years later,
and we went back there to inspect it again.


2,786 posted on 03/29/2017 4:50:56 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2773 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson