[Repeal The 17th]

BUT... the picture in post #2273
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3524221/posts?page=2273#2273
certainly does appear to be the other way around...
I just don’t really know.

[Repeal The 17th]

The only other thing I have to contribute at this time is that
somewhere ... outside of the sidewall, there would have been a
transition from the perforated pipe to a non-perforated pipe.

[EarthResearcher333]

Re: Post 2,354.....I should have identified "bell coupling" as a "bell coupling junction". The pipe protruding from the sidewall embankment shows no breakage of the end of the pipe - and it shows to be a non-bell end. My markup of a "bell" was to just identify where the "missing pipe pipe mating junction" was centered behind the sidewall (specific x and y with respect to the wall). For image viewing clarity I made the markup of the "bell" as solid (including blocking out the foreground of the person in the view).

There is a slight "flaring" of the remains of the elbow in the spillway wall. This also indicates the bell couplings were aligned appropriately (upslope) - at least for this "missing pipe" section.