To: steve86; dirtboy
I found this. This explains everything and it seems to me that if the emergency spillway goes and the main one through erosion, the whole dam could go.
1,567 posted on
02/19/2017 5:36:17 PM PST by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: metmom
Pay me now or pay me more later...
A stitch in time saves nine...
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure...
Hind-site is 20/20...
etc., etc., etc.
1,570 posted on
02/19/2017 5:51:14 PM PST by
Repeal The 17th
(I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
To: metmom
Metmom - could you send me the link? I’d like to pass that on.
1,571 posted on
02/19/2017 5:59:17 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
To: metmom
I like how they mention the 2005 ecological groups suit that they lost. They say it was against the Feds. In fact the Fed’s were peripheral and the suit was against the State. The state of California owns this pig and could have overlaid the top of the emergency run off area at any time. In fact. they could have topped it for much less than the figure mentioned and it probably would have worked.
California journalists — just knee jerk placing blame on the deep pocket feds.
1,572 posted on
02/19/2017 6:04:20 PM PST by
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
To: metmom
It explains a lot, but what happened (or didn’t) between 2005 and 2017? The Obama years are ironically left out.
1,573 posted on
02/19/2017 6:06:15 PM PST by
meyer
(The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson