There is only one Islam.”
Let’s discuss that a bit.
Clearly...in one sense, that is entirely true. All Muslims (not including nominal Muslims of course) are co-religionists, and will be have accordingly with respect to the infidel. Spot on.
However...there are also obviously intense rivalvies/factions which exist in Islam and who in fact are happy to kill each other when it comes to supremacy in a particular space (geographic, theological, etc.).
So...give those realities...what does a war against Islam generally even look like?
This is the part that I’m struggling with. We in the west, if we had to, could figure out how to go to war with whomever (Saudi Arabia, Libya, Yemen, wherever...) we can identify on a map. We can even do that to a certain extent with ISIS and that is what I think Trump is doing.
And in that context....we might even be able to subtly exploit “some” factions within Islam in order to defeat ISIS.
But then you have the problem of Isis sympathizers hidden in the west...and not just in Brussels or Amsterdam or Dearborn but all over.
In the real world, or in the old world of armies taking real estate and occupying it, defeating those enemies becomes more problematic.
So I agree entirely with those that say a shooting war is likely coming.
My difficulty is that I have a hard time seeing how that plays out exactly, because though Islam is one, as you note...but it is not one in that it is a place on the map that we could surround and bomb and take over, like Russia or China (which we do not need to do, because they are not actually expansionist and aggressive enemies).
Would love to hear anyone’s thoughts on that.....
We also have the problem that “Islam” is actually “more than one” because so much of the west is super sympathetic to Islam, because they see it as a persecuted race.
So a war with Islam is also going to cause a civil war in the west, with the racially-sensitive sympathizers eager to line up on the side of Islam and against the west.
not sure how much of a fighting force these liberals will constitute. but since they control the media, education, most of the political class, etc, and have unlimited funds....it’s difficult to see how a war with Islam doesn’t just become a global civil war with all open borders/globalists/socialists/environmentalists on one side, with Islam, against those that believe that nations exist and matter.
And I’m just not sure that a massive global civil war in the west is going to happen. I certainly hope that it does not; and I certainly see that it “could” happen. I just don’t think that it will, because the cost would be too great and the “reward” for the “winner” is so small.
So I sort of see the current conflict kind of continuing along the lines that it currently is....though escalating with more Berkeley events and so on.
But not sure it will go much more intense than that.
The ideology must be exposed for what it is.
Like Nazism, it is evil and like Nazism must be denounced as evil.
There are efforts afoot to squash the truth about Islam under the guise of Islamaphobia laws.
This must not only be resisted, but defeated with the truth about Islam. The ideology of Mohammed calls for the killing or subjugation of every person on earth.
Slavery was made unacceptable in the civilized world centuries ago, but is still acceptable in Islam.
The truth about Islam must be heralded from the mountaintops until it is renounced by its adherents or they die trying to kill us.
The west does not want a war with Islam, but refuses to acknowledge that Islam has been at war with the world since 622 A.D.
Their prophet commands them to continue the jihad until there is only Islam.
That leaves us no choice but the extirpation of Islam.
Mad Mo made it so.