This ruling is in direct contravention to the Constitutional requirement that, “The United States…shall protect each of [the states] against Invasion” (Article IV, Section 4) which should have trumped the TRO (illegal and potentially dangerous immigration is invasion). I think trump could give notice why these proceedings are an unconstitutional block on constitutional necessary and proper federal action and ignore the ruling and block the immigrants.
The case in the Robart court in Washington wasn’t a good faith challenge to the merits of Trump’s EO but a move to issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) which was issued in bad faith IMO since no irreparable harm was shown to validate a TRO. It’s a TRO//restraining order hearing where they’re arguing the merits of the EO instead of proving the need for a TRO/restraining order and they have failed to do so as I see it. Freaking Leftist courts.
The U.S. Code Title 8, Chapter 12 statue appears to be contradictory because of U.S.C. 1152 (a)(1)(a) (anti-discrimination clause) which is being used in these challenges. Congress needs to clean that up.
Nevertheless, Article IV, Section 4 absolutely trumps the valid or invalid TRO/restraining order.
Constitutional crisis? We’ve had that for decades - time to bring it to light.
“It’s a TRO//restraining order hearing where they’re arguing the merits of the EO ...”
Yes. They are to decide if the EO is Constitutional, not if it’s good policy.
Congress can decide if it is bad policy and act accordingly.