What I don't get is how two courts of law could rule against what is plainly stated in the law. When the courts refuse to enforce the law as plainly written and commonly observed, what stops a judge from declaring the election null and void, which a lot of liberals were screaming for, or even declaring himself the President until a new election can be held?
Certainly not the law, since these black robed dictators clearly think they ARE the law. This has to stop, period.
What I don't get is how two courts of law could rule against what is plainly stated in the law.Hey, they rule contrary to the Constitution all the time. This is a mere Feral law. Small potatoes, comparatively speaking.