Exactly. that's because the Arizona suit was against more lenient vetting so they ruled against their interference with Obama's EO, which is correct. These traitorous bastards are nothing but politicians in robes.
How dare they say there hasn't been terrorist attacks from these areas in this country. I'm sure they were saying the same before 911.
Also,these assholes don't know what the President is privy to from the intel briefing everyday and what is behind the “ban” on certain areas.
good lord, this is dangerous and stupid ruling as I've ever seen.
DJT needs to take care of this court when he gets time..after all the bigger issues are out of the way. Taking down the 9th should be on a short list.
"How dare they say there hasn't been terrorist attacks from these areas in this country."
Did they actually use that argument? We are not talking about past attacks, but potential future attacks. ISIS itself has said they want to use immigration as a tool for infiltration. We have seen that immigrants often lurk for long periods of time before engaging in terrorism.
The court is usurping an EXECUTIVE function; they are not talking about the law, but application of the law, about judgement about when and where and how the law should be applied. They are giving themselves the power of the executive.