Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Oversight Dem Elijah Cummings Wants Committee to Look Into Conway for Plugging Ivanka Brand
Mediaite.com ^ | 1:54 pm, February 9th, 2017 | by Josh Feldman |

Posted on 02/09/2017 12:53:29 PM PST by drewh

The top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee wants the committee to look into potential disciplinary action against Kellyanne Conway for plugging Ivanka Trump‘s brand on Fox News this morning.

After President Trump raised ethical questions with his tweet about Nordstrom yesterday, Conway repeatedly encouraged Fox viewers this morning to go purchase goods from the company run by the president’s daughter.

Elijah Cummings, ranking member on the House Oversight Committee, sent a letter to committee chair Jason Chaffetz calling Conway’s remarks “a textbook violation of government ethics laws and regulations enacted to prevent the abuse of an employee’s government position.”

He calls Conway’s breach of ethics rules “jaw-dropping” and wants the committee to take action:

Since the Committee has direct jurisdiction over the ethics laws applicable to White House employees, I request that the Committee make an official referral of this matter to the Office of Government Ethics and request that it report back to the Committee as soon as possible with its findings.

For the record, Chaffetz was asked about Trump’s Nordstrom tweet yesterday and said he didn’t see the big deal about it.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has already filed an ethics complaint against Conway.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: cummings; grabyourwallet; ivanka; ivankabrand; kellyanne; kellyanneconway; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: drewh

Cummings needs to shut up and worry about his own corrupt leaks that were exposed by Wikileaks. Political correctness will not save him with Trump’s DOJ in charge.

CGato


41 posted on 02/09/2017 1:47:39 PM PST by Conservative Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

This was mentioned on Fox and Friends this morning - on twitter in the last day or 2:

#buyivanka


42 posted on 02/09/2017 1:51:13 PM PST by Seattle Conservative (God Bless and Protect our Troops and their CIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

Exactly! Those who live in glass houses...


43 posted on 02/09/2017 1:51:22 PM PST by Boomer (The modern day leftist dems are the party of criminally insane haters and enemy #1 of the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Was Melania made in America?


44 posted on 02/09/2017 1:54:05 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

Obama and others in his admin plugged Obama books. Michelle and her staff plugged the designer of her dresses.


45 posted on 02/09/2017 1:57:32 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Gato
Political correctness will not save him with Trump’s DOJ in charge.

I find it amusing that the little traitors just keep exposing themselves and put a target on their foreheads. Saves Sessions time and energy in deciding who to look at first when it comes to draining the swamp of corruption..

46 posted on 02/09/2017 2:01:58 PM PST by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: drewh

I seem to remember Harry Reid plugging his daughters schmaltzy costume jewelry. Where was the liberal outrage then?


47 posted on 02/09/2017 2:09:20 PM PST by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

Yeah, I’m not going to be lectured about ethics from the likes of Elijah Cummings.

Or any other stinking politician for that matter.


48 posted on 02/09/2017 2:10:32 PM PST by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Democrat party outraged i tell ya outraged lol


49 posted on 02/09/2017 2:12:05 PM PST by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

What about Cummings transgressions? His district is a shambles.


50 posted on 02/09/2017 2:27:12 PM PST by Parmy (II don't know how to past the images.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

It is a trivial thing, but they are likely correct. As a government employee, she really shouldn’t be going on TV and recommending that people buy things from the Ivanka’s company.

Don’t need an ethics complaint. Just someone say “hey, you shouldn’t do that”. I’m sure she’ll understand when she thinks about it.

**************************
No need to cut and run on this. Her job is political. She was countering what she believes to be a politically motivated boycott, not trying to make a Trump rich. To understand the difference, consider what would have happened if a Tea Party person had urged GM to boycott “Tyrone’s Chevy,” a hypothetical black-owned auto dealer, for political reasons, and Obama had countered “Buy from Tyrone!” Do you think his crowd would be fleeing from this comment? No way.


51 posted on 02/09/2017 2:59:14 PM PST by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20

Chaffetz is referring Conway to the Ethics board, not crushing this stupidity.


52 posted on 02/09/2017 3:00:16 PM PST by Blooms in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: drewh

§ 2635.702 Use of public office for private gain.

An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity, including nonprofit organizations of which the employee is an officer or member, and persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment or business relations. The specific prohibitions set forth in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section apply this general standard, but are not intended to be exclusive or to limit the application of this section.


53 posted on 02/09/2017 3:00:16 PM PST by maxtheripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Obama and company COMPELLED me to buy their expensive healthcare plans.

Why is that an ethical violation?


54 posted on 02/09/2017 3:11:28 PM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Just get a rope for this idiot! ...


55 posted on 02/09/2017 3:19:43 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (FU Shmuckie Shoomer (Rat-NY) and Prick Durbin(Rat-IL))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blooms in CA

Are you kidding me? Unbelievable.


56 posted on 02/09/2017 4:30:33 PM PST by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: maxtheripper

Kellyanne Conway received no private gain for her remarks. Read the law, she did not break he law. Cummings is an @ss, I’m hoping Chaffetz is playing rope a dope on this: “We investigated, no laws broken, case closed. Now go to h*ll, you dumb@ss.”


57 posted on 02/09/2017 4:36:27 PM PST by RooRoobird20 ("Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20

“or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity”

seems to me to be the relevant part


58 posted on 02/10/2017 6:43:09 AM PST by maxtheripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Imagine if a POTUS hawked a product! Oh, wait...

http://www.businessinsider.com/barack-obama-has-his-own-signature-under-armour-shoe-2011-11


59 posted on 02/10/2017 2:12:16 PM PST by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson