“Well then, business will have to suffer, all right?”
Damn. They’ll just have to hire and pay AMERICANS to do these jobs!
“Don’t throw me in the briar patch!”
It should be, but it is not a bam on Muslims
Globalists suck.
Leaving the US vulnerable to error attacks is good for the economy? Who knew?
Fake News? Really? Who posted this garbage?
Forbes? Enough said.
Wow Forbes has gone downhill
Wasn’t aware we needed Muslims in order to function as a nation?
I love it! He wants to bring in MORE lawyers - and from Syria if you can believe it.
Just how many "promising ..." anythings will be coming from nations where the average national IQs range from 67 to 84?
“Slam”?
Think what it will do to the now massive terrorism-preparedness industry???!!!
This is unadulterated hysterical poppycock. A three-month ban on a handful of backward countries is not going to affect the economy. These people have lost their minds.
I’m rather confident that the US economy will do just fine and will not even notice, the lack of new mooselimbs into the US. Except of course, government handouts will not go higher due to them, and less of an increase in law enforcement and court costs. So, actually, I would clearly say the US economy is better off without these new invaders, and better still if we ejected the ones who are here.
Most of The Islamic invaders add almost nothing to the American economy. Rather they cost us all
In huge welfare and housing and education expenses paid for by taxpayers money. Plus super- sized security and policing extra expenses to deal with their riots and terrorist attacks on American Christians , Jews, nursing homes, shopping malls, pizza parlor, kindergartens, and military bases. Send them home. Send them home. Send them home. While we still can.
author is very anti-American in thinking the USofA needs more and more immigrants instead of raising up its own people and educating and training it’s own people.
He needs thicker glasses to even see his own need for thicker glasses.
They hated working for me because I was a woman. I had one young man who took personal calls while I was trying to have a business meeting with him.
Their work was substandard because they used every shortcut in the book and thus their product was not fool proof. Another reason to hate their woman project leader. I made them go back and do it right. I worked with other project leaders who just overlooked it and had everything fixed once they left.
Also, I mentioned this because it happened at my company and others. Some of them work long hours and after everyone leaves they go into conference rooms and use the telephone to call home. It seems to be a constant problem. And it does costs the company and usually ends in all employees being punished because they don't want to accuse unfairly, but Hello who calls India?
The primary purpose for hiring these people is to underpay them, but you do get what you pay for. I guess in this sense it would seem to hurt the economy because you will have to pay more to get the same work done, but not really when you consider the quality of work.
Everyone of their doomsday predictions fail to happen.
Barbara Streisand.