[WashingtonSource]

It is an attempted coup and the imperious judge will be squashed like a bug.

[spintreebob]

Repeatedly the media from NPR to CBS-ABC-NBC refers to the RIGHT of immigrants to come to the US.

This is a total redefinition of the word RIGHT.

All people, citizen and non-citizen have a right to life, to freedom of speech, of press, bear arms, etc.

But non-citizens do not have the right to live that life in the US. It is a privilege. A privilege that I would extend to more non-citizens than some here on FR.

But we make a big mistake if we allow the media to change the definition of terms and redefine living in the USA as a right. Even us natural born citizens are privileged to have been born in the USA. We should value that.

So yes, we citizens are more privileged than non-citizens. Now check that privilege.

If we lose this fight over grammar does anything mean anything?

[rcrngroup]

Federal district Judge James Robart of Seattle ordered a complete, nationwide temporary restraining order against President Trump's temporary ban on visitors from seven Middle Eastern countries. If you read the ruling as I have, you can see this is clearly unconstitutional on its face, and constitutes a judicial coup against President Trump and the executive branch.

So my puzzlement is....why doesn't Trump simply just ignore this rogue judge's order, and order his DHS to continue to carry out his ban? And screw this rogue judge!

[Georgia Girl 2]

This is just temporary obstruction. It will be overturned on appeal. The US immigration law is verfverfy clear about what the President canto. Rudy Guliani crafted Trumps ban so its bound to be completely constitutional.

[TomasUSMC]

Round them up when they get to the USA and keep them in holding till next Court of Appeals. Increase cost of entering the USA to help pay for this added cost.

Declare this a threat to national security and send them back. If there were an invading army would the courts be able to stop the USA from banning them?
They can come no problem, we comply with the communist judge but we send them back.

Trump should have inplace a bunch of judges that he can immediately appeal a case to...hell to it digitally. Should be able to appeal this case THE SAME DAMN DAY. THE APPEAL SHOULD BE READY BEFOREHAND.

All flights must be on special aircraft sent to special airports...THE COST PASSED ON TO THE IMMIGRANTS.

there are plenty of nitpick things we can do to counter these judges but the best is to ignore them. THIS IS A NATIONAL SECURITY QUESTION AND THE COURTS DON’T HAVE A SAY IN THAT.

When odumbi halted immigrants for 6 months no judge stood against him. Sessions should have this judge kicked off, he is getting money from who?

[PrairieLady2]

I decided to do a search on U.S. Code (symbol not included on my keyboard) 1182 and found among the offerings this website from Cornell U. which is a rather liberal university: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182 listed are many of the reasons why an alien may not be allowed in as well as exceptions. Below is a portion from that list. Please forgive the formatting, it didn't transfer well, and I placed some spaces for easier reading. Please not also, this law doesn't contain politically correct language, so if normal legalese coming from a liberal university offends you, then find your own link! ;) They use the word 'alien' as opposed to the politically correct term "immigrant'' or "undocumented worker" or what ever pablum some find more palatable. (B) Terrorist activities (i) In generalAny alien who— (I) has engaged in a terrorist activity; (II) a consular officer, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likely to engage after entry in any terrorist activity (as defined in clause (iv)); (III) has, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily harm, incited terrorist activity; (IV) is a representative (as defined in clause (v)) of— (aa) a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or (bb) a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity; (V) is a member of a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi); (VI) is a member of a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), unless the alien can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the alien did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization; (VII) endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization; (VIII) has received military-type training (as defined in section 2339D(c)(1) of title 18) from or on behalf of any organization that, at the time the training was received, was a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or (IX) is the spouse or child of an alien who is inadmissible under this subparagraph, if the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible occurred within the last 5 years,  is inadmissible. An alien who is an officer, official, representative, or spokesman of the Palestine Liberation Organization is considered, for purposes of this chapter, to be engaged in a terrorist activity.

[Boomer]

Sadly this is a Bush appointed judge but from what I read sometime last year; the obama admin loaded the federal judgeship’s with liberal judges. This is obviously a serious, possibly critical, hole in our constitutional system of justice that needs to be addressed by congress and the sooner the better.

In other words; Houston We Have A Problem.

[Grampa Dave]

Trump never banned Muslims. So this isn't fake news. It is news that never happened.

So This is about news that never happened and will not happen. It exists only in the drugged out mind of the so called reporters/journalist/mediots writing this non news.

So, it doesn't even qualify as fake news! .

I have a new tagline when I reply to a post about news that never happened nor will happen. It doesn't even qualify as fake news!