Well, that’s beside the point, since I don’t think Weiner ever took any pictures of the 15 year old. I guess it’s possible she may have sent him some and there could be charges from that, but I never heard anything like that.
The whole “child pornography” stuff was about the picture Weiner took of himself, and his son, when both of them were clothed. A judge would throw that case right out if any prosecutor tried to bring it to trial.
Quite right. But we don’t know what else is on that hard drive. We also don’t know how explicit the picture of the 15 year old is. There is some sort of law against possessing child porn, but if it doesn’t make Dr. Zaeus make angry monkey noises, it doesn’t play in Peoria. So far it’s unimpressive looking, but the NYPD is probably saving the real goods for a grand jury, and to scare Weenie into implicating others.