Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage
What are the concerns. Can you provide some brief bullet points?

2nd Amendment.

39 posted on 01/30/2017 9:21:00 AM PST by Old_Grouch (69 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Old_Grouch

What are the concerns. Can you provide some brief bullet points?

2nd Amendment.
...............................................................Wrong! This is not a second amendment issue! The police were called to a potentially dangerous situation where “guns were being waved around.” The guns were the reason for the call for police aid and “waved around” is reason for suspicion of irresponsible conduct. The police have a job to do which is to protect against endangerment and crime whenever possible. The officer saw the gun concealed and withdrew it from the possession of the questionable person. That person was found to be a felon carrying a stolen gun.
The court’s decision was correct in a law and order society.
This person had no “Right” to carry a gun within the law. His 2nd amendment right had been withdrawn due to his past felonious history. Being a “citizen” had nothing to do with the finding by the court. The decision was correct.


50 posted on 01/30/2017 12:40:56 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Old_Grouch

What are the concerns. Can you provide some brief bullet points?

2nd Amendment.
...............................................................Wrong! This is not a second amendment issue! The police were called to a potentially dangerous situation where “guns were being waved around.” The guns were the reason for the call for police aid and “waved around” is reason for suspicion of irresponsible conduct. The police have a job to do which is to protect against endangerment and crime whenever possible. The officer saw the gun concealed and withdrew it from the possession of the questionable person. That person was found to be a felon carrying a stolen gun.
The court’s decision was correct in a law and order society.
This person had no “Right” to carry a gun within the law. His 2nd amendment right had been withdrawn due to his past felonious history. Being a “citizen” had nothing to do with the finding by the court. The decision was correct.


51 posted on 01/30/2017 12:41:17 PM PST by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson