Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Neil Gorsuch: Some Cause for Concern
American Thinker ^ | January 30, 2017 | Lawrence D. Pratt and William J. Olson

Posted on 01/30/2017 6:57:00 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Kaslin

Pryor http://publicadvocateusa.orgnewsarticle.php?article=10892


21 posted on 01/30/2017 8:12:00 AM PST by GailA (Ret. SCPO wife: suck it up buttercups it's President Donald Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

Hmmmm ..?? As much as I support the 2nd Amendment, as well as concealed carry. This appears to say that a person who claimed to be a CC really was not .. and they also had a criminal record - keeping them from owning any type of weapon.

It would appear that Judge Gorsuch did the right thing for the right reasons. It really was in support of the 2nd because you don’t want people running around with weapons when they are LEGALLY not allowed to do so.

I don’t see any issue here at all.


22 posted on 01/30/2017 8:20:42 AM PST by CyberAnt (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

From the facts you stated here, I don’t have any problems with this search. “Observing strange behavior” could be almost anything, but at some point we have to give our police officers latitude in cases which may be a life or death situation. They were already called on the scene with two guys displaying guns in a store, that doesn’t sound like concealed carry, that sounds like they had them out with possible evil intent.


23 posted on 01/30/2017 8:34:23 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

“This appears to say that a person who claimed to be a CC really was not .. “

He never identified as himself as a CC.


24 posted on 01/30/2017 8:35:01 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20FCO%2020131231054/U.S.%20v.%20RODRIGUEZ


25 posted on 01/30/2017 8:36:57 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

Yea, even Scalia endorsed flag burning.


26 posted on 01/30/2017 8:37:31 AM PST by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940

Howard Phillips warned about Souter, but no one would listen.


27 posted on 01/30/2017 8:38:41 AM PST by Theodore R. (Let's not squander the golden opportunity of 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Well, if you produce a license - whether fake or real - you are identifying as a CC holder.


28 posted on 01/30/2017 8:43:12 AM PST by CyberAnt (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940
"This is like the night before Souter was appointed. High hopes."

That is the great fear to be sure. However, I have heard from John Sununu about this. He was the one who recommended him to Bush and was told this guy was a solid conservative choice. He got this recommendation from someone else and so it sounds to me like Souter was not properly vetted at all. All of the 21 picks were vetted through the Federalist Society and the Heritage foundation. They were the ones that came up with the list so that makes me feel a lot better that we won't get this one screwed up.
29 posted on 01/30/2017 8:43:23 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
"Yea, even Scalia endorsed flag burning"

If you read the opinion and what he said about it, Scalia was right.
30 posted on 01/30/2017 8:44:39 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

“Well, if you produce a license - whether fake or real - you are identifying as a CC holder.”

I refer you back to my last post to you.


31 posted on 01/30/2017 8:47:09 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Nope, that’s a classic Terry stop and frisk. Weapons are what’s being “frisked” for in a Terry stop. The Terry case justifies this on the basis of officer safety and the officer is allowed to take possession of the weapon while with the person. However an officer must be able to articulate specific facts which would provide a basis to suspect that the individual may be involved with criminal activity.
_________________________________________
Just like other Constitutional protections of citizen rights, there are no absolutes. An armed citizen who is temporarily detained by a law enforcement officer on reasonable suspicion that a crime has or is being committed, presents a very special Second Amendment issue. Does the citizen have an absolute right to maintain possession of his legally authorized firearm during the detention and inquiry? It is a hard question but I conclude he does not. Obviously, if the inquiry leads to no arrest, the firearm should be returned to the citizen.


32 posted on 01/30/2017 8:48:48 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

OK, so he obviously in the wrong on that one, but is that the only case he’s ever decided that raises concerns? If so, I’m not going to Chicken Little about it. I’m sure every judge has stubbed his toe once or twice.


33 posted on 01/30/2017 8:50:23 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If you had read my post in its entirety you’d have comprehended that I was axing that very question. I do not know whether that source is excerpt only or not.

Sorry you took offense. I shall not take offense at your FIL scolding or your “sweet smile”, though the latter takes some effort.


34 posted on 01/30/2017 8:54:51 AM PST by OKSooner ("What's the frequency, Kenneth?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

“OK, so he obviously in the wrong on that one,”

He was correct on that one.


35 posted on 01/30/2017 9:02:51 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

If you are required to have a permit or a license for just about anything, the authorities have the right to stop you and check to ensure that your permit is in place.

Sounds like a legal search to me.


36 posted on 01/30/2017 9:12:48 AM PST by dirtymac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

” Does the citizen have an absolute right to maintain possession of his legally authorized firearm during the detention and inquiry? “

That is one issue. In this case the detainee did not identify himself as being armed and upon seeing the gun, the officer removed it.

As it turned out, he was a felon in possession of a stolen gun.


37 posted on 01/30/2017 9:12:48 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac

“Sounds like a legal search to me.”

It wasn’t a search. The officer had him detained and while escorting him outside the gun became visible in his back waistband. The officer merely pulled the gun out as the dude passed by him.

Subsequently it was found that he was a felon in possession of a stolen gun.


38 posted on 01/30/2017 9:15:05 AM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
What are the concerns. Can you provide some brief bullet points?

2nd Amendment.

39 posted on 01/30/2017 9:21:00 AM PST by Old_Grouch (69 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Maybe so. I am not legal trained but still have hope in our President to make a right choice. Maybe not perfect but right just the same.


40 posted on 01/30/2017 9:28:08 AM PST by dirtymac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson