Posted on 01/26/2017 4:54:24 PM PST by JesusIsLord
One of the leading candidates for the U.S. Supreme Court is William Pryor. “Public Advocate” has sounded the alarm about William Pryor's history of persecuting pro-Family hero, Judge Roy Moore.
Just weeks ago, Pryor ruled against a middle school that wanted to keep radical homosexual indoctrination out of its classes.
In 2011, Pryor concurred with a ruling that created a new "right to transgender bathrooms and transgender employment privileges" -- despite not offering one constitutional argument or legal precedent to support this radical position.
In 2010-2011 Public Advocate was fighting to defend the right of Augusta State University student Jennifer Keeton to remain a Christian in her counseling program. The conservative legal group, Judicial Action Group, discovered that Pryor stood against Public Advocate before. Jennifer Keeton had been ordered by her academic superiors to reject her Christian beliefs and embrace the radical Homosexual Agenda if she wished to remain in the program. Ms. Keeton wanted to be an elementary school counselor. But apparently her Christian beliefs on homosexuality were an automatic disqualification for counseling young children. Her department ordered her to submit to a program of Homosexual Re-Education designed to "remediate" her traditional views -- including attending a public pornographic display or "gay pride parade." Jennifer took this fight to court and lost -- despite petitions from thousands of Public Advocate supporters. And Judge William Pryor "concurred in full" with the decision to expel this Christian student for refusing to change her beliefs to fit the agenda of the Homosexual Lobby. Pryor even went so far as to say this created a precedent that would allow for persecution against all Christians in the field of counseling. He hid behind this so-called "private ethics code" to justify his violation of the First Amendment.
Pryor is bad for Christians and Religious Liberty.
(Excerpt) Read more at publicadvocateusa.org ...
Pryor sounds good until you look at his record.
The best choice that I’ve seen would be Thomas R. Lee.
You may want to read post 11 by savagesusie, which offers great insight to the application of law as originally intended.
- Just weeks ago, Pryor ruled against a middle school that wanted to keep radical homosexual indoctrination out of its classes.
- In 2011, Pryor concurred with a ruling that created a new "right to transgender bathrooms and transgender employment privileges" -- despite not offering one constitutional argument or legal precedent to support this radical position.
- In 2010-2011, Jennifer Keeton had been ordered by her academic superiors to reject her Christian beliefs and embrace the radical Homosexual Agenda if she wished to remain in her college program. Her department ordered her to submit to a program of Homosexual Re-Education designed to "remediate" her traditional views -- including attending a public pornographic display or "gay pride parade." Jennifer took this fight to court and lost. Pryor was on that court. He even went so far as to say this created a precedent that would allow for persecution against all Christians in the field of counseling. He hid behind this so-called "private ethics code" to justify his violation of the First Amendment.
How much more information does one need to understand that this man is anti-Christian. For some, being anti-Christian is not a disqualifier. For me and millions of other Christians, it is.
The legal questions and decisions involved. Sometimes the law brings about a result we don't like. In that case you seek to change the law.
As I said, this article doesn't make it clear.
ff
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.