[Jim W N]

Notwithstanding your phony assertions and phony “concern”, I explained why the Constitution is triggered and relevant to ANY federal action or department to which you replied with ad hominems and no-sequiturs. So add irrational and unreasonable to your phony assertions and phony “concerns”.

You don’t like the relevant statement I posted.

I couldn’t care less.

Go pound sand.

[fortheDeclaration]

Once again, you need to read what the post was about and it wasn't about the constitutionally of the agriculture dept.

No one cares about your 'deep' constitutional insights.